Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37268747›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Stimulus specific cortical activity associated with ignoring distraction during working memory encoding and maintenance.

Charlotte Ashton, Andre D Gouws, Marcus Glennon, Abhishek Das, Yit-Keat Chen, Charlotte Chrisp, Ismail Felek, Theodore P Zanto, Fiona McNab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlotte AshtonDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Andre D GouwsYork Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5NY, UK.
Marcus GlennonDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Abhishek DasDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Yit-Keat ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Charlotte ChrispDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Ismail FelekDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Theodore P ZantoDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158, USA.
Fiona McNabDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. fiona.mcnab@york.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT091826AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distraction disrupts Working Memory (WM) performance, but how the brain filters distraction is not known. One possibility is that neural activity associated with distractions is suppressed relative to a baseline/passive task (biased competition). Alternatively, distraction may be denied access to WM, with no suppression. Furthermore, behavioural work indicates separate mechanisms for ignoring distractions which occur (1) while we put information into WM (Encoding Distraction, ED) and (2) while we maintain already encoded information during the WM delay period (Delay Distraction, DD). Here we used fMRI in humans to measure category-sensitive cortical activity and probe the extent to which ED/DD mechanisms involve enhancement/suppression during a WM task. We observed significant enhancement of task-relevant activity, relative to a passive view task, which did not differ according to whether or when distractors appeared. For both ED and DD we found no evidence of suppression, but instead a robust increase in stimulus specific activity in response to additional stimuli presented during the passive view task, which was not seen for the WM task, when those additional stimuli were to be ignored. The results indicate that ED/DD resistance does not necessarily involve suppression of distractor-related activity. Rather, a rise in distractor-associated activity is prevented when distractors are presented, supporting models of input gating, and providing a potential mechanism by which input-gating might be achieved.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Short-TermBrainCognitionHeadHumans

Identifiers

PMID37268747
PMCPMC10238503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.