Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37268730›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023

DeepBreath-automated detection of respiratory pathology from lung auscultation in 572 pediatric outpatients across 5 countries.

Julien Heitmann, Alban Glangetas, Jonathan Doenz, Juliane Dervaux, Deeksha M Shama, Daniel Hinjos Garcia, Mohamed Rida Benissa, Aymeric Cantais, Alexandre Perez, Daniel Müller and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Audio-based digital biomarkers in diagnosing and managing respiratory diseases: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Leveraging artificial intelligence for the management of preschool wheeze: A narrative review.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Julien Heitmann *Intelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alban Glangetas *Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Women, Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jonathan DoenzIntelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6047-9488
Juliane DervauxIntelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Deeksha M ShamaIntelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniel Hinjos GarciaIntelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mohamed Rida BenissaDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Women, Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aymeric CantaisPediatric Emergency Department, Hospital University of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-2129
Alexandre PerezDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Women, Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1454-4327
Daniel MüllerIntelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-233X
Tatjana ChavdarovaIntelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle Ruchonnet-MetraillerDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Women, Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4771-875X
Johan N SiebertDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Women, Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2871-3382
Laurence LacroixDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Women, Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.
Martin JaggiIntelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alain GervaixDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Women, Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mary-Anne HartleyIntelligent Global Health Research Group, Machine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. mary-anne.hartley@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8826-3870
with the Pneumoscope Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interpretation of lung auscultation is highly subjective and relies on non-specific nomenclature. Computer-aided analysis has the potential to better standardize and automate evaluation. We used 35.9 hours of auscultation audio from 572 pediatric outpatients to develop DeepBreath : a deep learning model identifying the audible signatures of acute respiratory illness in children. It comprises a convolutional neural network followed by a logistic regression classifier, aggregating estimates on recordings from eight thoracic sites into a single prediction at the patient-level. Patients were either healthy controls (29%) or had one of three acute respiratory illnesses (71%) including pneumonia, wheezing disorders (bronchitis/asthma), and bronchiolitis). To ensure objective estimates on model generalisability, DeepBreath is trained on patients from two countries (Switzerland, Brazil), and results are reported on an internal 5-fold cross-validation as well as externally validated (extval) on three other countries (Senegal, Cameroon, Morocco). DeepBreath differentiated healthy and pathological breathing with an Area Under the Receiver-Operator Characteristic (AUROC) of 0.93 (standard deviation [SD] ± 0.01 on internal validation). Similarly promising results were obtained for pneumonia (AUROC 0.75 ± 0.10), wheezing disorders (AUROC 0.91 ± 0.03), and bronchiolitis (AUROC 0.94 ± 0.02). Extval AUROCs were 0.89, 0.74, 0.74 and 0.87 respectively. All either matched or were significant improvements on a clinical baseline model using age and respiratory rate. Temporal attention showed clear alignment between model prediction and independently annotated respiratory cycles, providing evidence that DeepBreath extracts physiologically meaningful representations. DeepBreath provides a framework for interpretable deep learning to identify the objective audio signatures of respiratory pathology.

Identifiers

PMID37268730
PMCPMC10238513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.