ArticleScientific reports2023
Machine learning explainability in nasopharyngeal cancer survival using LIME and SHAP.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Explainability and Integrability of Medical AI to Promote Health Care Professional Acceptance and Use: Mixed Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- An explainable multimodal 2.5D deep learning-radiomics model for predicting extranodal extension in lung adenocarcinoma using preoperative CT: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Early and late mortality among patients with T1-T3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a machine learning analysis using a SEER population-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dual-Sabatier Optima: How Reaction Mechanism Determines Activity Volcano Map of Dual-Atom Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable prognostic model for bladder cancer based on lactylation associated genes using SHAP analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning differentiates necrotizing fasciitis and osteomyelitis via routine blood biomarkers.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Integrative Transcriptomic and Machine Learning Analysis of ecDNA-Associated Features for Studying Chemotherapy Resistance in TNBC.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare methods, evaluation, and clinical integration.iScience · 2026Review
- Prediction of metabolically healthy obesity based on dietary nutrients: a comparative analysis of six machine learning models with SHAP and LIME interpretation.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2026Article
- A pan-cancer multi-omicFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Modeling the relationship between residents' happiness and human settlement quality: An IGSA-MLPNN-GARSON approach.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning and mendelian randomization identify risk factors for lower extremity arterial embolism and thrombosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict the Risk of Medical Decision-Making Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients From Multicenter Tertiary Hospitals in China.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable AI for treatment decision-making in immunoradiotherapy of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Integrating MR dynamic radiomics and clinical parameters for machine learning-based prediction of short-term response to induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Early diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on machine learning modelling and blood plasma metallomics analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning for survival outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter validation study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Artificial intelligence in head and neck cancer: a bibliometric and visualization analysis (1995-2025).Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Development of machine learning models for survival prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma using population-based data.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Prediction of ectopic pregnancy using interpretable machine learning algorithms.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) has a unique histopathology compared with other head and neck cancers. Individual NPC patients may attain different outcomes. This study aims to build a prognostic system by combining a highly accurate machine learning model (ML) model with explainable artificial intelligence to stratify NPC patients into low and high chance of survival groups. Explainability is provided using Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) techniques. A total of 1094 NPC patients were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for model training and internal validation. We combined five different ML algorithms to form a uniquely stacked algorithm. The predictive performance of the stacked algorithm was compared with a state-of-the-art algorithm-extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to stratify the NPC patients into chance of survival groups. We validated our model with temporal validation (n = 547) and geographic external validation (Helsinki University Hospital NPC cohort, n = 60). The developed stacked predictive ML model showed an accuracy of 85.9% while the XGBoost had 84.5% after the training and testing phases. This demonstrated that both XGBoost and the stacked model showed comparable performance. External geographic validation of XGBoost model showed a c-index of 0.74, accuracy of 76.7%, and area under curve of 0.76. The SHAP technique revealed that age of the patient at diagnosis, T-stage, ethnicity, M-stage, marital status, and grade were among the prominent input variables in decreasing order of significance for the overall survival of NPC patients. LIME showed the degree of reliability of the prediction made by the model. In addition, both techniques showed how each feature contributed to the prediction made by the model. LIME and SHAP techniques provided personalized protective and risk factors for each NPC patient and unraveled some novel non-linear relationships between input features and survival chance. The examined ML approach showed the ability to predict the chance of overall survival of NPC patients. This is important for effective treatment planning care and informed clinical decisions. To enhance outcome results, including survival in NPC, ML may aid in planning individualized therapy for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.