Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37268445›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of anaesthesia2023

Subjective experiences during dexmedetomidine- or propofol-induced unresponsiveness and non-rapid eye movement sleep in healthy male subjects.

Katja Valli, Linda Radek, Roosa E Kallionpää, Annalotta Scheinin, Jaakko Långsjö, Kaike Kaisti, Oskari Kantonen, Jarno Korhonen, Tero Vahlberg, Antti Revonsuo and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01889004 (The Neural Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Human Consciousness), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01889004 phase4completednot on this map

The Neural Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Human Consciousness (LOC-2013)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TurkuRan2014 to 2016Enrolled47ConditionsConsciousness, Level AlteredArmsDexmedetomidine, Propofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Dreaming during anaesthesia: a scoping review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Katja ValliDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, School of Bioscience, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden. Electronic address: katval@utu.fi.
Linda RadekTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Roosa E KallionpääDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Annalotta ScheininDepartment of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jaakko LångsjöTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Department of Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Kaike KaistiTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Oskari KantonenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jarno KorhonenDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tero VahlbergInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Biostatistics, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Antti RevonsuoDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, School of Bioscience, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
Harry ScheininDepartment of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Institute of Biomedicine and Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep share common neural pathways and neurophysiological features. We hypothesised that these states bear resemblance also at the experiential level.

methodsWe compared, in a within-subject design, the prevalence and content of experiences in reports obtained after anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep. Healthy males (N=39) received dexmedetomidine (n=20) or propofol (n=19) in stepwise doses to induce unresponsiveness. Those rousable were interviewed and left unstimulated, and the procedure was repeated. Finally, the anaesthetic dose was increased 50%, and the participants were interviewed after recovery. The same participants (N=37) were also later interviewed after NREM sleep awakenings.

resultsMost subjects were rousable, with no difference between anaesthetic agents (P=0.480). Lower drug plasma concentrations were associated with being rousable for both dexmedetomidine (P=0.007) and propofol (P=0.002) but not with recall of experiences in either drug group (dexmedetomidine: P=0.543; propofol: P=0.460). Of the 76 and 73 interviews performed after anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep, 69.7% and 64.4% included experiences, respectively. Recall did not differ between anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep (P=0.581), or between dexmedetomidine and propofol in any of the three awakening rounds (P>0.05). Disconnected dream-like experiences (62.3% vs 51.1%; P=0.418) and memory incorporation of the research setting (88.7% vs 78.7%; P=0.204) were equally often present in anaesthesia and sleep interviews, respectively, whereas awareness, signifying connected consciousness, was rarely reported in either state.

conclusionsAnaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep are characterised by disconnected conscious experiences with corresponding recall frequencies and content. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinical trial registration. This study was part of a larger study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01889004).

Indexed as

AnestheticsDexmedetomidinePropofolEye MovementsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleSleepAnestheticsDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesPropofolanaesthesiaawarenessconsciousnessdexmedetomidinedreamingpropofolsleepunresponsiveness

Identifiers

PMID37268445
PMCPMC10375502
OpenAlexW4378903827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.