Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37267530›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2023

A High-Throughput Workflow for FFPE Tissue Proteomics.

Ganesh P Pujari, Kiran K Mangalaparthi, Benjamin J Madden, Firdous A Bhat, M Cristine Charlesworth, Amy J French, Gunveen Sachdeva, Eugenio Daviso, Ulrich Thomann, Patrick McCarthy and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proteomic approaches for interrogating kinase signaling networks.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ganesh P PujariDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Kiran K MangalaparthiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Benjamin J MaddenProteomics Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Firdous A BhatDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
M Cristine CharlesworthProteomics Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Amy J FrenchProteomics Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Gunveen SachdevaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Eugenio DavisoCovaris, LLC, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, United States.
Ulrich ThomannCovaris, LLC, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, United States.
Patrick McCarthyCovaris, LLC, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5087-6049
Sameer VasantgadkarCovaris, LLC, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, United States.
Debadeep BhattacharyyaCovaris, LLC, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, United States.
Akhilesh PandeyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9943-6127
Mayo Clinic · USCovaris (United States) · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lila J. Rutten · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical ProteomicsU01CA271410 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Rafael Fonseca, AKHILESH PANDEY · 2022 to 2026
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS U01 CA271410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) has become an indispensable tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of specific regions obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples in both clinical and research settings. Low protein yields from LCM samples along with laborious sample processing steps present challenges for proteomic analysis without sacrificing protein and peptide recovery. Automation of sample preparation workflows is still under development, especially for samples such as laser-capture microdissected tissues. Here, we present a simplified and rapid workflow using adaptive focused acoustics (AFA) technology for sample processing for high-throughput FFPE-based proteomics. We evaluated three different workflows: standard extraction method followed by overnight trypsin digestion, AFA-assisted extraction and overnight trypsin digestion, and AFA-assisted extraction simultaneously performed with trypsin digestion. The use of AFA-based ultrasonication enables automated sample processing for high-throughput proteomic analysis of LCM-FFPE tissues in 96-well and 384-well formats. Further, accelerated trypsin digestion combined with AFA dramatically reduced the overall processing times. LC-MS/MS analysis revealed a slightly higher number of protein and peptide identifications in AFA accelerated workflows compared to standard and AFA overnight workflows. Further, we did not observe any difference in the proportion of peptides identified with missed cleavages or deamidated peptides across the three different workflows. Overall, our results demonstrate that the workflow described in this study enables rapid and high-throughput sample processing with greatly reduced sample handling, which is amenable to automation.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysProteomicsHumansPeptidesWorkflowPeptides

Identifiers

PMID37267530
PMCPMC10326908
OpenAlexW4379184362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.