ArticleBlood advances2023
Moving toward a conceptualization of measurable residual disease in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A 2026 update on myelodysplastic neoplasms: current state, challenges and future directions.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Prognostic value of measurable residual disease in high-risk MDS after intensive chemotherapy in HOVON-SAKK studies.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of post-transplantation measurable residual disease in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: A prospective cohort study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- Review
- Advancing drug development in myelodysplastic syndromes.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Considerations and challenges.Seminars in hematology · 2024Review
- Beneficial effects of cellular immunotherapy in the prevention and treatment of posttransplant hematologic relapse of myelodysplastic neoplasms.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Molecular alterations monitoring in myelodysplastic patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Article
- Measurable (Minimal) Residual Disease in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): Current State and Perspectives.Cancers · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Threefold IPSS-M reclassification outperforms original stratification in predicting post-transplant outcomes for MDS patients.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 90% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) have somatic mutations that are known or suspected to be oncogenic in the malignant cells. The genetic risk stratification of MDSs has evolved substantially with the introduction of the clinical molecular international prognostic scoring system, which establishes next-generation sequencing at diagnosis as a standard of care. Furthermore, the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias has refined the MDS diagnostic criteria with the introduction of a new MDS/acute myeloid leukemia category. Monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) has historically been used to define remission status, improve relapse prediction, and determine the efficacy of antileukemic drugs in patients with acute and chronic leukemias. However, in contrast to leukemias, assessment of MRD, including tracking of patient-specific mutations, has not yet been formally defined as a biomarker for MDS. This article summarizes current evidence and challenges and provides a conceptual framework for incorporating MRD into the treatment of MDS and future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.