ArticleScience advances2023
Gaps and weaknesses in the global protected area network for safeguarding at-risk species.
Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does habitat protection status matter? Insights from a tropical primate community in Northeast Bangladesh.Primates; journal of primatology · 2026Article
- Habitat Quality, Conservation Gaps, and Environmental Suitability of Siberian Cranes (Biology · 2026Article
- Post-2020 conservation priorities are threatened by global mining.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Spatial identification of areas suitable for other effective area-based conservation measures in the European Union.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Climate Change Reduces Habitat Suitability of the Endemic Iranian Ground-Jay (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- China's "greening but weakening" protected areas reveal a global conservation quality-quantity dilemma.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Unravelling tree diversity patterns and responses to environmental gradients in a tropical forest landscape of the Western Ghats.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Global 1-km habitat distribution for endangered species and its spatial changes under future warming scenarios.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Climate-Smart Siting for renewable energy expansion.iScience · 2024Review
- Inferring the extinction risk of marine fish to inform global conservation priorities.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protected areas are essential to biodiversity conservation. Creating new parks can protect larger populations and more species, yet strengthening existing parks, particularly those vulnerable to harmful human activities, is a critical but underappreciated step for safeguarding at-risk species. Here, we model the area of habitat that terrestrial mammals, amphibians, and birds have within park networks and their vulnerability to current downgrading, downsizing, or degazettement events and future land-use change. We find that roughly 70% of species analyzed have scant representation in parks, or occur within parks that are affected by shifts in formal legal protections or are vulnerable to increased human pressures. Our results also show that expanding and strengthening park networks across just 1% of the world's land area could preserve irreplaceable habitats of 1191 species that are particularly vulnerable to extinction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.