Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37267340›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

A pilot-scale comparison between single and double-digest RAD markers generated using GBS strategy in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.).

Pradeep Ruperao, Prasad Bajaj, Rajkumar Subramani, Rashmi Yadav, Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy Lachagari, Sivarama Prasad Lekkala, Abhishek Rathore, Sunil Archak, Ulavappa B Angadi, Rakesh Singh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pradeep RuperaoCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Prasad BajajCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Rajkumar SubramaniICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, PUSA Campus, New Delhi, India.
Rashmi YadavICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, PUSA Campus, New Delhi, India.
Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy LachagariAgriGenome Labs Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sivarama Prasad LekkalaAgriGenome Labs Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Abhishek RathoreExcellence in Breeding Platform, CIMMYT, Hyderabad, India.
Sunil ArchakICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, PUSA Campus, New Delhi, India.
Ulavappa B AngadiICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistical Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh SinghICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, PUSA Campus, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-6420
Kuldeep SinghGenebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Sean MayesCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Parimalan RanganICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, PUSA Campus, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1660-8072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To reduce the genome sequence representation, restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) protocols is being widely used either with single-digest or double-digest methods. In this study, we genotyped the sesame population (48 sample size) in a pilot scale to compare single and double-digest RAD-seq (sd and ddRAD-seq) methods. We analysed the resulting short-read data generated from both protocols and assessed their performance impacting the downstream analysis using various parameters. The distinct k-mer count and gene presence absence variation (PAV) showed a significant difference between the sesame samples studied. Additionally, the variant calling from both datasets (sdRAD-seq and ddRAD-seq) exhibits a significant difference between them. The combined variants from both datasets helped in identifying the most diverse samples and possible sub-groups in the sesame population. The most diverse samples identified from each analysis (k-mer, gene PAV, SNP count, Heterozygosity, NJ and PCA) can possibly be representative samples holding major diversity of the small sesame population used in this study. The best possible strategies with suggested inputs for modifications to utilize the RAD-seq strategy efficiently on a large dataset containing thousands of samples to be subjected to molecular analysis like diversity, population structure and core development studies were discussed.

Indexed as

SesamumBase SequenceGenomeGenotypeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID37267340
PMCPMC10237379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.