Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37267238›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

High-frequency fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) observations to assess water quality drivers at an enclosed beach.

Ryan T Searcy, Jacob R Phaneuf, Alexandria B Boehm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan T SearcyDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8332-1819
Jacob R PhaneufDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Alexandria B BoehmDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8162-5090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) are monitored at beaches to assess water quality and associated health risk from recreational exposure. However, monitoring is generally conducted infrequently (i.e. weekly or less often), potentially leading to inaccurate assessment of water quality at a beach at the time of use. While some work has shown that FIB in marine environments can vary over short (e.g. subhourly) time scales, that work has been mainly focused on 'open' beaches. 'Enclosed' beaches-those that are partially barriered from exchange with offshore water and thus have different residence times and mixing dynamics in the nearshore environment-have been less studied. Here we present results from a high-frequency (once per 30 minutes) FIB sampling event conducted within a Central California, USA, harbor over 48 hours. FIB concentrations at this enclosed site were more variable at high-frequencies than what has been reported at open beach sites. Correlation and regression analyses showed FIB concentrations were most strongly associated with chlorophyll a concentration, turbidity, wind speed, and tide level. Results indicate the importance of measuring FIB concentrations and explanatory environmental parameters at appropriate temporal resolutions when conducting water quality monitoring or source tracking studies. Overall, this work highlights how high-frequency sampling can effectively provide information about water quality dynamics at beaches of interest.

Indexed as

Bathing BeachesWater QualityBacteriaChlorophyll AEnvironmental MonitoringFecesWater MicrobiologyChlorophyll A

Identifiers

PMID37267238
PMCPMC10237476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.