Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37267054›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of audiology2024

Rethinking the clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) signal-to-noise ratio.

Nicholas Portugal, Gayla L Poling, Laura Dreisbach

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of audiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Longitudinal Evaluation of Otoacoustic Emissions as a Screening Tool for High-Frequency Hearing Loss in Adolescents.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Pre-treatment audiological and vestibular assessment in adults starting platinum-based chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas PortugalSchool of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Gayla L PolingDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Audiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Laura DreisbachSchool of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
San Diego State University · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Repeatability of High-Frequency Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in ChildrenR03DC008195 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DREISBACH, LAURA · 2007 to 2009
$224k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC008195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDistortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels are repeatable over time in normal-hearing individuals making DPOAE levels an ideal measurement for monitoring cochlear status in clinic and research applications. However, if DPOAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values instead of levels are used for monitoring, the repeatability of this value needs to be established. This retrospective, cross-sectional study sought to determine DPOAE SNR repeatability in younger children, older children, young adults and a patient population with normal hearing.

designEach participant attended four sessions where DPOAE discrete frequency sweeps were collected at conventional (≤ 8 kHz) and/or extended-high frequencies (> 8 kHz). To examine the extent of variability to be expected for DPOAE SNR, average absolute SNR differences-between-trials were determined and compared to average absolute DPOAE level differences-between-trials. STUDY SAMPLES: One hundred forty-five participants, incorporating four different groups from three different studies. Ages ranged from 3 to 55 years.

resultsAverage SNR differences-between-trials across all frequencies are greater than differences for average DPOAE levels. Improved calibration methods result in SNR differences-between-trials that are similar across all frequencies.

conclusionsWhen monitoring cochlear health over an extended bandwidth, DPOAE levels are less variable across trials than SNR values, thus allowing earlier indicators of cochlear damage.

Indexed as

Otoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousSignal-To-Noise RatioAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCochleaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiescalibrationdistortion product otoacoustic emissionsmonitoringnormal hearingOtoacoustic emissionssignal-to-noise ratio

Identifiers

PMID37267054
PMCPMC10692308
OpenAlexW4379162931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.