Trial reportJAMA2023
Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02744092 (Direct Oral Anticoagulants), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus LMWH +/- Warfarin for VTE in Cancer: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial (CANVAS Trial)
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Predictors of recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Novel Anticoagulants for the Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis and Development of a Prediction Model.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Pooled it
- Advances and Challenges in the Application of Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Brazilian guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of pulmonary embolism. Official document of the Brazilian Thoracic Association based on the GRADE methodology.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025Guideline
- SEOM clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with brain tumor undergoing craniotomy: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- API-CAT investigators' decisions on anticoagulation following extended treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Trial
- Predictors of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in patients with cancer: A secondary analysis of the CANVAS trial.Thrombosis research · 2024Trial
- Verification and optimization of the VTE risk stratification system for multiple myeloma.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- The Cancer Immunotherapy Thromboembolism Assessment: A Novel Score for Predicting Thromboembolic Events in Melanoma Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibition.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants in cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: trial robustness and clinical trade-offs.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Direct oral anticoagulantsWorld journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Beyond existing rating scales: development of a novel nomogram for predicting severe clinical bleeding associated with low-molecular-weight heparin in hospitalized medical patients.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Bleeding and Death in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Deep eutectic solvents@enteric technology for orally delivering anticoagulant macromolecule drug.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In patients with cancer who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, long-term anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent recurrent VTE. The effectiveness of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE in patients with cancer is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate DOACs, compared with LMWH, for preventing recurrent VTE and for rates of bleeding in patients with cancer following an initial VTE event. Design, Setting, and Participants: Unblinded, comparative effectiveness, noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted at 67 oncology practices in the US that enrolled 671 patients with cancer (any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) who had a new clinical or radiological diagnosis of VTE. Enrollment occurred from December 2016 to April 2020. Final follow-up was in November 2020. Intervention: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a DOAC (n = 335) or LMWH (n = 336) and were followed up for 6 months or until death. Physicians and patients selected any DOAC or any LMWH (or fondaparinux) and physicians selected drug doses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the recurrent VTE rate at 6 months. Noninferiority of anticoagulation with a DOAC vs LMWH was defined by the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI for the difference of a DOAC relative to LMWH of less than 3% in the randomized cohort that received at least 1 dose of assigned treatment. The 6 prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding, which was assessed using a 2.5% noninferiority margin. Results: Between December 2016 and April 2020, 671 participants were randomized and 638 (95%) completed the trial (median age, 64 years; 353 women [55%]). Among those randomized to a DOAC, 330 received at least 1 dose. Among those randomized to LMWH, 308 received at least 1 dose. Rates of recurrent VTE were 6.1% in the DOAC group and 8.8% in the LMWH group (difference, -2.7%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 0.7%) consistent with the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Of 6 prespecified secondary outcomes, none were statistically significant. Major bleeding occurred in 5.2% of participants in the DOAC group and 5.6% in the LMWH group (difference, -0.4%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 2.5%) and did not meet the noninferiority criterion. Severe adverse events occurred in 33.8% of participants in the DOAC group and 35.1% in the LMWH group. The most common serious adverse events were anemia and death. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with cancer and VTE, DOACs were noninferior to LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE over 6-month follow-up. These findings support use of a DOAC to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744092.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.