ReviewCell and tissue research2023
Statistical study of clinical trials with stem cells and their function in skin wound.
Review in Cell and tissue research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tissue Reaction to Monofilament Grafts of Different Weights Used for Abdominal Wall Reinforcement.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Regulation of inflammation during wound healing: the function of mesenchymal stem cells and strategies for therapeutic enhancement.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been known as a reliable and effective source to repair damaged tissues. The differentiation and self-renewal ability, easy access, immune system modulation capability, and important role in the process of repairing wounds have caused using these cells extensively in wound healing. In this review study, the role of MSCs is debated about different diseases especially in repairing skin wounds. This review article was obtained from 75 basic and trial articles on the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Clinical Trials databases between 2000 and 2022. MSCs are capable of migrating to the wound site and are effective in all stages of wound healing. These cells differentiate into skin cells and also inhibit inflammatory responses, proliferation, and differentiation cells through paracrine messages. They stimulate locally resident precursors, leading to angiogenesis, epithelial regeneration, and granular tissue formation. During maturation stages, these cells decrease fibrosis tissue formation and wound contraction and increase collagen expression and wound tensile strength. The molecular factors of the lesion site change function of these cells and cause MSCs to create a wound healing microenvironment instead of a fibrotic microenvironment. Currently, significant advances have been achieved in the delivery of MSCs to wound sites. These cells are injected intravenously or intradermally, with or without a scaffold. They are also used in the form of spray or hydrogels. Furthermore, the extracellular vesicles and the synergistic environment of these cells alone are effective. Forthcoming studies could lead to more effective treatment strategies for the use of MSCs in wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.