ArticleThe ultrasound journal2023
Real-time Remote Expert-guided Echocardiography by Medical Students.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Health for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEchocardiography is a highly specialised examination performed by experienced healthcare professionals. These experienced healthcare professionals may not be available to patients during all hours in rural healthcare facilities. Remote-guided echocardiography could improve the availability of specialised care for patients living in rural areas. This study examined the feasibility of real-time remote guidance for medical students to perform an echocardiographic assessment of the left side of the heart. Thirteen healthy volunteers were recruited for remote-guided echocardiography, which was performed by 13 medical students. Student examinations/images were compared to reference echocardiography. Measurements of left ventricular fractional shortening and mitral valve blood flow velocity were also compared. Furthermore, guidance through a smartphone videoconference was compared to designated remote guidance software.
resultsTwo-thirds of the images acquired by students were rated as medium or good quality and usable to evaluate two thirds of the cardiac structures. No significant bias was found for left ventricular fractional shortening. The measurements from the students' exams had a variation coefficient of 14.8% compared to the reference. The calculated deviation of the insonation angle was above 25° for both E and A-wave mitral valve blood flow velocity measurements. Images acquired by guidance through smartphone videoconference were of lower quality than those obtained using the designated remote guidance software.
conclusionReal-time remote-guided echocardiography performed by medical students has limited value for clinical screening but could be useful for educational purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.