Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37266707›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2023

What we imagine learning from watching others: how motor imagery modulates competency perceptions resulting from the repeated observation of a juggling action.

Sarah N Kraeutner, April Karlinsky, Zachary Besler, Timothy N Welsh, Nicola J Hodges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah N KraeutnerNeuroplasticity, Imagery, and Motor Behaviour Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Rm 204 -Arts and Sciences Centre (ASC), University of British Columbia, 3187 University Way, Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, V1V1V7, Canada. sarah.kraeutner@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6552-6682
April KarlinskyDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA, 92407, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7452-5200
Zachary BeslerMotor Skills Lab, School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z3, Canada.
Timothy N WelshCentre for Motor Control Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 2C9, Canada.
Nicola J HodgesMotor Skills Lab, School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3899-8550

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada DG (Hodges)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although motor learning can occur from observing others perform a motor skill (action observation; AO), observers' confidence in their own ability to perform the skill can be falsely increased compared to their actual ability. This illusion of motor competence (i.e., 'over-confidence') may arise because the learner does not gain access to sensory feedback about their own performance-a source of information that can help individuals understand their veridical motor capabilities. Unlike AO, motor imagery (MI; the mental rehearsal of a motor skill) is thought to be linked to an understanding of movement consequences and kinaesthetic information. MI may thus provide the learner with movement-related diagnostic information, leading to greater accuracy in assessing ability. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of MI when paired with AO in assessments of one's own motor capabilities in an online observation task. Two groups rated their confidence in performing a juggling task following repeated observations of the action without MI (OBS group; n = 45) or with MI following observation (OBS+MI; n = 39). As predicted, confidence increased with repeated observation for both groups, yet increased to a greater extent in the OBS relative to the OBS+MI group. The addition of MI appeared to reduce confidence that resulted from repeated AO alone. Data support the hypothesis that AO and MI are separable and that MI allows better access to sensory information than AO. However, further research is required to assess changes in confidence that result from MI alone and motor execution.

Indexed as

ImaginationMotor SkillsHumansMovement

Identifiers

PMID37266707
PMCPMC10236399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.