ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2024
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of olokizumab at different dosages in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of olokizumab at different dosages in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
methodsWe performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of olokizumab administered intravenously to RA patients at 64 mg/kg every 2 or 4 weeks (Q2 or Q4W).
resultsFive RCTs comprising 2609 patients met the inclusion criteria. Both olokizumab Q2 and Q4W treatments achieved a significant American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) compared with the placebo (odds ratio [OR] 3.21, 95% credible interval [CrI] 2.53-4.09; OR 3.05, 95% CrI 2.43-3.86). However, olokizumab Q2W was associated with the most favorable surface using the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the ACR20 response rate. The ranking probability based on the SUCRA indicated that olokizumab Q2W had the highest probability of being considered the best treatment option for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by olokizumab Q4W, adalimumab, and placebo. The ACR50 and 70 response rates showed a similar distribution pattern to the ACR20 response rate, except that olokizumab Q4W had a higher-ranking probability than olokizumab Q2W for ACR50. The SUCRA rating likelihood of adverse events (AEs) and withdrawal due to AEs showed that a placebo was likely to be the best intervention.
conclusionBoth olokizumab Q2 and Q4W were efficacious and well-tolerated treatments for active RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.