Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37266666›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[The implications of the concepts One Health and Planetary Health for the environmental medicine of the 21st century].

Tomke Zschachlitz, Romy Kümpfel, Hildegard Niemann, Wolfgang Straff

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Precision medicine in infectious diseases].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomke ZschachlitzFachgebiet II 1.5 Umweltmedizin und gesundheitliche Bewertung, Umweltbundesamt, Corrensplatz 1, 14195, Berlin, Deutschland. Tomke.zschachlitz@uba.de.
Romy KümpfelAbteilung 2 für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, FG 24 Gesundheitsberichterstattung, Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Deutschland.
Hildegard NiemannAbteilung 2 für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, FG 24 Gesundheitsberichterstattung, Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Deutschland.
Wolfgang StraffFachgebiet II 1.5 Umweltmedizin und gesundheitliche Bewertung, Umweltbundesamt, Corrensplatz 1, 14195, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 21st century, an accumulation of complex crises such as climate change, biodiversity loss, environmental pollution, wars, and pandemics is leading to economic, social, and health problems for people of current and future generations. These problems are essentially due to the disregard of natural regenerative capacities of ecosystems. Health approaches such as One Health and Planetary Health have gained popularity since the early 2000s and are increasingly used in politics, science, and the health professions. Environmental medicine is also influenced by the growing number of crises and environmental problems and the increasing interest in the concepts of One Health and Planetary Health.In this discussion paper, the development of the two concepts is first presented. Then, their significance for environmental medicine will be discussed. Health professionals working on environmental medicine issues must now consider both local and global causes and health effects when assessing environmental impacts, which can complicate decisions and lead to conflicting objectives.

Indexed as

Environmental MedicineOne HealthEcosystemEnvironmentGermanyHumansClimate changeEnvironment and HealthGlobal healthPlanetary boundariesPublic health

Identifiers

PMID37266666
PMCPMC10235829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.