ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Spatial-temporal data-augmentation-based functional brain network analysis for brain disorders identification.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing EEG Decoding with Selective Augmentation Integration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis Using PET-MRI: A Narrative Review of High-Impact Literature Post-Tauvid Approval.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Multi-atlas ensemble graph neural network model for major depressive disorder detection using functional MRI data.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Due to the lack of devices and the difficulty of gathering patients, the small sample size is one of the most challenging problems in functional brain network (FBN) analysis. Previous studies have attempted to solve this problem of sample limitation through data augmentation methods, such as sample transformation and noise addition. However, these methods ignore the unique spatial-temporal information of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, which is essential for FBN analysis. Methods: To address this issue, we propose a spatial-temporal data-augmentation-based classification (STDAC) scheme that can fuse the spatial-temporal information, increase the samples, while improving the classification performance. Firstly, we propose a spatial augmentation module utilizing the spatial prior knowledge, which was ignored by previous augmentation methods. Secondly, we design a temporal augmentation module by random discontinuous sampling period, which can generate more samples than former approaches. Finally, a tensor fusion method is used to combine the features from the above two modules, which can make efficient use of spatial-temporal information of fMRI simultaneously. Besides, we apply our scheme to different types of classifiers to verify the generalization performance. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed scheme, we conduct extensive experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset and REST-meta-MDD Project (MDD) dataset. Results: Experimental results show that the proposed scheme achieves superior classification accuracy (ADNI: 82.942%, MDD: 63.406%) and feature interpretation on the benchmark datasets. Discussion: The proposed STDAC scheme, utilizing both spatial and temporal information, can generate more diverse samples than former augmentation methods for brain disorder classification and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.