ArticleRSC advances2023
Strong attractive interaction between finite element models of twisted cellulose nanofibers by intermeshing of twists.
Article in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of the attractive interaction between intrinsically twisted cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) is essential to control the physical properties of the higher-order structures of CNFs, such as paper and spun fiber. In this study, a finite element model reflecting the typical morphology of a twisted CNF was used to analyze the attractive interaction forces between multiple approaching CNF models. For two parallel CNF models, when one of the CNF models was rotated 90° around the long-axis direction, the twisting periods meshed, giving the maximum attraction force. Conversely, when the two CNF models were approaching diagonally, the CNF models were closest at an angle of -3.2° (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.