Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37266469›Full record

ArticleMaedica2023

Innovative Cadaver Preservation Techniques: a Systematic Review.

Ariyanachi Kaliappan, Rohini Motwani, Tanu Gupta, Mrudula Chandrupatla

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Frozen or GlycerinatedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Challenges for Anatomists in the Era of Omics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariyanachi KaliappanDepartment of Anatomy, AIIMS Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.
Rohini MotwaniDepartment of Anatomy, AIIMS Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.
Tanu GuptaFirst year medical student, AIIMS Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.
Mrudula ChandrupatlaDepartment of Anatomy, AIIMS Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · INDeccan College of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cadaveric dissection is a unique and unrivalled educational tool that allows students in medicine and associated life sciences to explore spatial three-dimensional anatomy, principles of structure and related function, and anatomical variations, including pathological alterations. Human tissue dissection enables researchers to comprehend the variety that exists in life that cannot be appreciated through the literature or artificial specimens. Using cadavers is the best way to simulate surgical and anatomical teaching. A cadaver has been shown to imitate surgical and anatomical training better than any other existing method. By the use of soft embalming approaches, cadavers have become more realistic and training-friendly. The main aim of this review is to describe various innovative and recent cadaver preservation techniques in detail, which can help anatomists to modify the techniques in their institute for gross anatomy teaching and surgical training or workshops to get a lifelike cadaver.

Identifiers

PMID37266469
PMCPMC10231151
OpenAlexW4379093436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.