ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of angle assessment for righting reaction from a tilted sitting position in healthy participants.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Righting Reaction in Hemiplegic Stroke Survivors: Impact of Lower Limb Motor Paralysis Severity.Cureus · 2025Article
- Effects of Task-related Trunk Training with Sensory Electrical Stimulation on Sitting Balance in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Lateral balance and the righting reaction are related to trunk function and many activities of daily living. However, there are no studies evaluating the assessment of the righting reaction while ensuring safety. This study aimed to clarify the reliability of assessments for the righting reaction from a tilted sitting position in healthy participants. [Participants and Methods] The participants of this study included 28 healthy young adults. Before the start of the study, markers were attached to the participants for data collection. Participants were asked to sit on a vertical board, tilted 10 degrees, and were asked to perform the righting reaction. This test was repeated four times on each side. The actions were recorded with a video camera, and two analysts used the Image J software to calculate the angles of the righting reaction of the neck, trunk, and left and right lower legs. [Results] High reliability was obtained regardless of the tilt direction and site of righting reaction. In addition, no adverse events occurred. [Conclusion] It was possible to evaluate the righting reaction while ensuring safety, and reproducibility was confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.