ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2023
Couples' sexual health after gynaecological cancer diagnosis - an unexplored area for further research.
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06958068 (Integrating Mandatory Sexual Health Counseling in Gynaecological Oncology), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Integrating Mandatory Sexual Health Counseling in Gynaecological Oncology: A Paradigm Shift From Diagnosis to Survivorship.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of sexual function in women with endometrial cancer and their partners following surgery versus surgery additional brachytherapy: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary care center.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A cross-sectional study of factors influencing sexual health among spouses of patients with cervical cancer.PloS one · 2025Article
- Strategies, Challenges, and Prospects of Nanoparticles in Gynecological Malignancies.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Article
- Predictors of sexual activity and function in women and men with multiple sclerosis - a preliminary study.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the sexual inhibitory tone, body image, self-concept, and sexual performance in couples after gynaecological cancer treatment, and to identify areas for further prospective studies. Material and methods: Thirty gynaecological cancer survivors with a heterosexual partner were assessed during a semi-structural sexual interview. Sexual excitation/sexual inhibition scales were used to evaluate proneness to sexual stimuli, whereas a body exposure during sexual activity questionnaire was used to assess body avoidance during sex. Self-concept in cancer survivors was evaluated by a sexual self-scheme scale. The differences in sexual needs, satisfaction, and sexual activity were comped between women and their partners. Results: In survivors and their partners the sexual inhibitory tone was higher than the excitatory tone - 3.91 and 2.45 vs. 2.97 and 2.31, respectively. Most women were schematic-positive and co-schematic - 46.7% and 40.0%, respectively. The decrease in importance of sex was higher in women compared to their partners (D change -0.88 and -0.22, respectively). The frequency of satisfying sex decreased after treatment in women but increased in their partners - D change: -1.04 and +2.94, respectively. Satisfaction with sexual life and quality of relationship improved or did not change after cancer diagnosis in women. None of the sexual response elements were changed by the cancer diagnosis in partners. Conclusions: In cancer survivors with a sexual partner, both people should be carefully counselled because there are some important differences in perception of sexual needs within the couple. Avoiding body exposure during sex and differences in proneness to sexual stimuli should be explored in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.