Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37266338›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2023

Couples' sexual health after gynaecological cancer diagnosis - an unexplored area for further research.

Krzysztof Nowosielski, Aleksandra Pałka

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06958068 (Integrating Mandatory Sexual Health Counseling in Gynaecological Oncology), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06958068 completednot on this map

Integrating Mandatory Sexual Health Counseling in Gynaecological Oncology: A Paradigm Shift From Diagnosis to Survivorship.

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University of SilesiaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled324ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancers, Vaginal Cancers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krzysztof NowosielskiDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Center, Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Aleksandra PałkaDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Center, Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the sexual inhibitory tone, body image, self-concept, and sexual performance in couples after gynaecological cancer treatment, and to identify areas for further prospective studies. Material and methods: Thirty gynaecological cancer survivors with a heterosexual partner were assessed during a semi-structural sexual interview. Sexual excitation/sexual inhibition scales were used to evaluate proneness to sexual stimuli, whereas a body exposure during sexual activity questionnaire was used to assess body avoidance during sex. Self-concept in cancer survivors was evaluated by a sexual self-scheme scale. The differences in sexual needs, satisfaction, and sexual activity were comped between women and their partners. Results: In survivors and their partners the sexual inhibitory tone was higher than the excitatory tone - 3.91 and 2.45 vs. 2.97 and 2.31, respectively. Most women were schematic-positive and co-schematic - 46.7% and 40.0%, respectively. The decrease in importance of sex was higher in women compared to their partners (D change -0.88 and -0.22, respectively). The frequency of satisfying sex decreased after treatment in women but increased in their partners - D change: -1.04 and +2.94, respectively. Satisfaction with sexual life and quality of relationship improved or did not change after cancer diagnosis in women. None of the sexual response elements were changed by the cancer diagnosis in partners. Conclusions: In cancer survivors with a sexual partner, both people should be carefully counselled because there are some important differences in perception of sexual needs within the couple. Avoiding body exposure during sex and differences in proneness to sexual stimuli should be explored in further studies.

Indexed as

gynaecological cancerpartnersexual activitysexual inhibitionsexualitysexual self-schema

Identifiers

PMID37266338
PMCPMC10230241
OpenAlexW4377290565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.