ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Classification of gait phases based on a machine learning approach using muscle synergy.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep Learning Models Optimization for Gait Phase Identification from EMG Data During Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Insights into motor impairment assessment using myographic signals with artificial intelligence: a scoping review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate detection of the gait phase is crucial for monitoring and diagnosing neurological and musculoskeletal disorders and for the precise control of lower limb assistive devices. In studying locomotion mode identification and rehabilitation of neurological disorders, the concept of modular organization, which involves the co-activation of muscle groups to generate various motor behaviors, has proven to be useful. This study aimed to investigate whether muscle synergy features could provide a more accurate and robust classification of gait events compared to traditional features such as time-domain and wavelet features. For this purpose, eight healthy individuals participated in this study, and wireless electromyography sensors were attached to four muscles in each lower extremity to measure electromyography (EMG) signals during walking. EMG signals were segmented and labeled as 2-class (stance and swing) and 3-class (weight acceptance, single limb support, and limb advancement) gait phases. Non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) was used to identify specific muscle groups that contribute to gait and to provide an analysis of the functional organization of the movement system. Gait phases were classified using four different machine learning algorithms: decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and neural network (NN). The results showed that the muscle synergy features had a better classification accuracy than the other EMG features. This finding supported the hypothesis that muscle synergy enables accurate gait phase classification. Overall, the study presents a novel approach to gait analysis and highlights the potential of muscle synergy as a tool for gait phase detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.