Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37266041›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Walking like a robot: do the ground reaction forces still intersect near one point when humans imitate a humanoid robot?

Johanna Vielemeyer, Nora-Sophie Staufenberg, Lucas Schreff, Daniel Rixen, Roy Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The virtual pivot point concept improves predictions of ground reaction forces.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johanna VielemeyerInstitute of Sport Sciences, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07737 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1282-3576
Nora-Sophie StaufenbergMunich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence, Technical University Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Lucas SchreffGaitLab, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany.
Daniel RixenMunich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence, Technical University Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Roy MüllerGaitLab, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4688-1515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipedal walking while keeping the upper body upright is a complex task. One strategy to cope with this task is to direct the ground reaction forces toward a point above the centre of mass of the whole body, called virtual pivot point (VPP). This behaviour could be observed in various experimental studies for human and animal walking, but not for the humanoid robot LOLA. The question arose whether humans still show a VPP when walking like LOLA. For this purpose, ten participants imitated LOLA in speed, posture, and mass distribution (LOLA-like walking). It could be found that humans do not differ from LOLA in spatio-temporal parameters for the LOLA-like walking, in contrast to upright walking with preferred speed. Eight of the participants show a VPP in all conditions (

Indexed as

bipedal gaithumanoid robotvirtual pivot point

Identifiers

PMID37266041
PMCPMC10230186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.