Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37266017›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Characteristics of endophytic bacteria and active ingredients in the Eucommiae cortex from different origins.

Xuejuan Liang, Kang Zhou, Penghui Li, Dan Wan, Jing Liu, Xin Yi, Yanmei Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The accumulation of active ingredients ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xuejuan LiangInnovative Medicine Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan Academy of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Kang ZhouCollege of Pharmacy, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Penghui LiInnovative Medicine Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan Academy of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Dan WanInnovative Medicine Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan Academy of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Jing LiuCollege of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Xin YiCollege of Pharmacy, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Yanmei PengInnovative Medicine Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan Academy of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the differences between Eucommiae cortex (EC) endophytic bacteria from different origins and their effects on the active ingredients of EC. Methods: A total of 10 samples of Results: A total of 4,551 different operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were delineated in the four groups of samples, of which 585, 439, 957, and 684 genera were annotated from GZ, HUB, HUN, and SX, respectively. The richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria from different origins were ranked as HUN > SX > GZ or HUB. The analysis demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between the diversity and richness of endophytic bacteria in EC and its active ingredients. Nevertheless, notable variations in the community structures of endophytic bacteria were observed across different origins, and they had a considerable impact on certain active ingredients in EC. Conclusion: There was a complex correlation between EC endophytic bacteria and active ingredient content, while EC endophytic bacteria from different origins had significant differences at the genus level.

Indexed as

active ingredientendophytic bacteriaEucommiae cortexE. ulmoidesorigin

Identifiers

PMID37266017
PMCPMC10229866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.