Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37265875›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2023

Cardiovascular disease risk assessment using a deep-learning-based retinal biomarker: a comparison with existing risk scores.

Joseph Keunhong Yi, Tyler Hyungtaek Rim, Sungha Park, Sung Soo Kim, Hyeon Chang Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Hyeonmin Kim, Geunyoung Lee, James Soo Ghim Lim, Yong Yu Tan and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Joseph Keunhong YiAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Tyler Hyungtaek RimSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, The Academia, 20 College Rd, Level 6 Discovery Tower, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6465-2620
Sungha ParkDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-478X
Sung Soo KimDivision of Retina, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon Chang KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Chan Joo LeeDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonmin KimMediwhale Inc., 43, Digital-ro 34- gil, Guro-gu, Seoul 08378, Republic of Korea.
Geunyoung LeeMediwhale Inc., 43, Digital-ro 34- gil, Guro-gu, Seoul 08378, Republic of Korea.
James Soo Ghim LimMediwhale Inc., 43, Digital-ro 34- gil, Guro-gu, Seoul 08378, Republic of Korea.
Yong Yu TanSchool of Medicine, University College Cork, College Road, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland.
Marco YuSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, The Academia, 20 College Rd, Level 6 Discovery Tower, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Yih-Chung ThamSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, The Academia, 20 College Rd, Level 6 Discovery Tower, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Ameet BakhaiDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, Barnet General Hospital, Pond St, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Eduard ShantsilaDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
Paul LeesonCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, RDM Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9181-9297
Gregory Y H LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
Calvin W L ChinNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Dr, Singapore 169609, Singapore.
Ching-Yu ChengSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, The Academia, 20 College Rd, Level 6 Discovery Tower, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-885X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W003686/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the ability of a deep-learning-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) retinal biomarker, Reti-CVD, to identify individuals with intermediate- and high-risk for CVD. Methods and results: We defined the intermediate- and high-risk groups according to Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE), QRISK3, and modified Framingham Risk Score (FRS). Reti-CVD's prediction was compared to the number of individuals identified as intermediate- and high-risk according to standard CVD risk assessment tools, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the results. In the UK Biobank, among 48 260 participants, 20 643 (42.8%) and 7192 (14.9%) were classified into the intermediate- and high-risk groups according to PCE, and QRISK3, respectively. In the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases study, among 6810 participants, 3799 (55.8%) were classified as intermediate- and high-risk group according to modified FRS. Reti-CVD identified PCE-based intermediate- and high-risk groups with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 82.7%, 87.6%, 86.5%, and 84.0%, respectively. Reti-CVD identified QRISK3-based intermediate- and high-risk groups with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 82.6%, 85.5%, 49.9%, and 96.6%, respectively. Reti-CVD identified intermediate- and high-risk groups according to the modified FRS with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 82.1%, 80.6%, 76.4%, and 85.5%, respectively. Conclusion: The retinal photograph biomarker (Reti-CVD) was able to identify individuals with intermediate and high-risk for CVD, in accordance with existing risk assessment tools.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseDeep learningReti-CVDRetinal photographRisk stratificationSingapore Epidemiology of Eye DiseasesUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID37265875
PMCPMC10232236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.