ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2023
An explainable artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram analysis model for the classification of reduced left ventricular function.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- External validation of artificial intelligence-guided electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) in detecting asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2027Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence in electrocardiography: A systematic review.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2026Article
- Web-Based Application of Simplified Machine Learning for Detecting Reduced LVEF From 12-Lead ECG.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography for assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the era of foundation models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- MnL-TWA: Manifold Learning Approach for T-Wave Alternans Detection in Ambulatory Environments.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Care in Action: From Learning to Implementation in Health Systems.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- Screening for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Based on 12 Leads of the Electrocardiogram-Applicable in Clinical Practice?-Critical Literature Review with Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-based identification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction from 12-lead electrocardiograms: external validation and advanced application of an existing model.European heart journal. Digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The black box nature of artificial intelligence (AI) hinders the development of interpretable AI models that are applicable in clinical practice. We aimed to develop an AI model for classifying patients of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) with the decision-interpretability. Methods and results: We acquired paired ECG and echocardiography datasets from the central and co-operative institutions. For the central institution dataset, a random forest model was trained to identify patients with reduced LVEF among 29 907 ECGs. Shapley additive explanations were applied to 7196 ECGs. To extract the model's decision criteria, the calculated Shapley additive explanations values were clustered for 192 non-paced rhythm patients in which reduced LVEF was predicted. Although the extracted criteria were different for each cluster, these criteria generally comprised a combination of six ECG findings: negative T-wave inversion in I/V5-6 leads, low voltage in I/II/V4-6 leads, Q wave in V3-6 leads, ventricular activation time prolongation in I/V5-6 leads, S-wave prolongation in V2-3 leads, and corrected QT interval prolongation. Similarly, for the co-operative institution dataset, the extracted criteria comprised a combination of the same six ECG findings. Furthermore, the accuracy of seven cardiologists' ECG readings improved significantly after watching a video explaining the interpretation of these criteria (before, 62.9% ± 3.9% vs. after, 73.9% ± 2.4%; Conclusion: We visually interpreted the model's decision criteria to evaluate its validity, thereby developing a model that provided the decision-interpretability required for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.