Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37265833›Full record

ArticleMalawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi2022

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of clinically important bacterial pathogens at the Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.

Faheema E Choonara, Bjørg C Haldorsen, Isaac Ndhlovu, Osborne Saulosi, Tarsizio Maida, Fanuel Lampiao, Gunnar S Simonsen, Sabiha Y Essack, Arnfinn Sundsfjord

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Faheema E ChoonaraAntimicrobial Research Unit, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Bjørg C HaldorsenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance (K-res), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Isaac NdhlovuMicrobiology Laboratory, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Osborne SaulosiMicrobiology Laboratory, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Tarsizio MaidaMicrobiology Laboratory, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Fanuel LampiaoAfrica Centre of Excellence in Public Health and Herbal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Gunnar S SimonsenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance (K-res), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Sabiha Y EssackAntimicrobial Research Unit, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Arnfinn SundsfjordDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance (K-res), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Kamuzu Central Hospital · MWUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to ascertain antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in clinical bacterial pathogens from in-hospital adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. Methods: Clinical specimens (blood culture, pus, urine and cerebrospinal fluid) collected during June to December 2017 were examined for bacterial growth in standard aerobic conditions. One specimen per patient was included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the disk diffusion method and interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines. Results: A total of 694 specimens were collected during the study period, of which 336 (48%) specimen yielded visible bacterial growth. Of the 336 specimens, a total of 411 phenotypically different isolates were recovered. Of the 411 isolates, 84 isolates (20%) were excluded and the remaining 327 (80%) were further characterised. The characterised isolates were identified as ESKAPE pathogens (n=195/327; 60%), Conclusion: The high proportion of the MDR ESBL-phenotype in clinical isolates of

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusBacteriaEscherichia coliHospitalsHumansMalawiMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsAmpCantimicrobial resistanceESBLESKAPE

Identifiers

PMID37265833
PMCPMC10230581
OpenAlexW4224003750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.