Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37265781›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2023

Dynamic models for musical rhythm perception and coordination.

Edward W Large, Iran Roman, Ji Chul Kim, Jonathan Cannon, Jesse K Pazdera, Laurel J Trainor, John Rinzel, Amitabha Bose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cortico-striatal network architecture shapes rhythmic biases in music.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Music as a scientific metaphor for mind and brain.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Temporal codes and recurrent timing nets for rhythmic expectancy.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Deep oscillatory neural network.Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward W LargeDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, CT, United States.
Iran RomanMusic and Audio Research Laboratory, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Ji Chul KimDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, CT, United States.
Jonathan CannonDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jesse K PazderaDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Laurel J TrainorDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
John RinzelCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Amitabha BoseDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythmicity permeates large parts of human experience. Humans generate various motor and brain rhythms spanning a range of frequencies. We also experience and synchronize to externally imposed rhythmicity, for example from music and song or from the 24-h light-dark cycles of the sun. In the context of music, humans have the ability to perceive, generate, and anticipate rhythmic structures, for example, "the beat." Experimental and behavioral studies offer clues about the biophysical and neural mechanisms that underlie our rhythmic abilities, and about different brain areas that are involved but many open questions remain. In this paper, we review several theoretical and computational approaches, each centered at different levels of description, that address specific aspects of musical rhythmic generation, perception, attention, perception-action coordination, and learning. We survey methods and results from applications of dynamical systems theory, neuro-mechanistic modeling, and Bayesian inference. Some frameworks rely on synchronization of intrinsic brain rhythms that span the relevant frequency range; some formulations involve real-time adaptation schemes for error-correction to align the phase and frequency of a dedicated circuit; others involve learning and dynamically adjusting expectations to make rhythm tracking predictions. Each of the approaches, while initially designed to answer specific questions, offers the possibility of being integrated into a larger framework that provides insights into our ability to perceive and generate rhythmic patterns.

Indexed as

Bayesian modelingbeat perceptiondynamical systemsentrainmentmusicneuro-mechanistic modelingsynchronization

Identifiers

PMID37265781
PMCPMC10229831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.