Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37265705›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Alveolar ridge preservation in post-extraction sockets using concentrated growth factors: a split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Sadam Ahmed Elayah, Hamza Younis, Hao Cui, Xiang Liang, Karim Ahmed Sakran, Baleegh Alkadasi, Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi, Mohammed Albadani, Wafa Al-Okad, Junbo Tu and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07256730 (Comparative Study Between Artificial Intelligence-Assisted/Computer-Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting Utilizing Electromagnetic Mallet for Reconstruction of Horizontal Ridge Defects), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07256730 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Artificial Intelligence-Assisted/Computer-Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting Utilizing Electromagnetic Mallet for Reconstruction of Horizontal Ridge Defects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKafrelsheikh UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled22ConditionsReconstruction of Horizontal Ridge DefectsArmsfree-hand ridge splitting, AI/guided ridge splitting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. L-shape technique with concentrated growth factor for horizontal bone defects in the maxillary anterior region: a clinical and radiographic study.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sadam Ahmed ElayahKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Hamza YounisKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Hao CuiKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiang LiangKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Karim Ahmed SakranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen.
Baleegh AlkadasiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen.
Essam Ahmed Al-MoraissiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Thamar University, Thamar, Yemen.
Mohammed AlbadaniDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen.
Wafa Al-OkadDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Junbo TuKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Sijia NaKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNIbb University · YESana'a University · YESichuan University · CNThamar University · YE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this clinical trial was to assess the impact of autologous concentrated growth factor (CGF) as a socket-filling material and its ridge preservation properties following the lower third molar extraction. Materials and methods: A total of 60 sides of 30 participants who had completely symmetrical bilateral impacted lower third molars were enrolled. The primary outcome variables of the study were bone height and width, bone density, and socket surface area in the coronal section. Cone beam computed tomography images were obtained immediately after surgery and three months after surgery as a temporal measure. Follow-up data were compared to the baseline using paired and unpaired Results: CGF sites had higher values in height and width when compared to control sites (Buccal wall 32.9 ± 3.5 vs 29.4 ± 4.3 mm, Lingual wall 25.4 ± 3.5 vs 23.1 ± 4 mm, and Alveolar bone width 21.07 ± 1.55vs19.53 ± 1.90 mm, respectively). Bone density showed significantly higher values in CGF sites than in control sites (Coronal half 200 ± 127.3 vs -84.1 ± 121.3 and Apical half 406.5 ± 103 vs 64.2 ± 158.6, respectively). There was a significant difference between both sites in the reduction of the periodontal pockets. Conclusion: CGF application following surgical extraction provides an easy, low-cost, and efficient option for alveolar ridge preservation. Thus, the use of CGF by dentists during dental extractions may be encouraged, particularly when alveolar ridge preservation is required. Clinical trial registration: TCTR identification, TCTR20221028003.

Indexed as

Tooth ExtractionTooth SocketCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansalveolar ridgeCGFextractionimpacted teethplateletregeneration

Identifiers

PMID37265705
PMCPMC10231034
OpenAlexW4377042850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.