ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2023
A multi-stage dynamical fusion network for multimodal emotion recognition.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential translation-based multimodal sentiment analysis under uncertain missing modalities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interactive graph emotion recognition based on multi-modal data enhancement.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transformer-Driven Affective State Recognition from Wearable Physiological Data in Everyday Contexts.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research on emotion recognition using sparse EEG channels and cross-subject modeling based on CNN-KAN-[Formula: see text] model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Emotion Recognition Using EEG Signals and Audiovisual Features with Contrastive Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, emotion recognition using physiological signals has become a popular research topic. Physiological signal can reflect the real emotional state for individual which is widely applied to emotion recognition. Multimodal signals provide more discriminative information compared with single modal which arose the interest of related researchers. However, current studies on multimodal emotion recognition normally adopt one-stage fusion method which results in the overlook of cross-modal interaction. To solve this problem, we proposed a multi-stage multimodal dynamical fusion network (MSMDFN). Through the MSMDFN, the joint representation based on cross-modal correlation is obtained. Initially, the latent and essential interactions among various features extracted independently from multiple modalities are explored based on specific manner. Subsequently, the multi-stage fusion network is designed to split the fusion procedure into multi-stages using the correlation observed before. This allows us to exploit much more fine-grained unimodal, bimodal and trimodal intercorrelations. For evaluation, the MSMDFN was verified on multimodal benchmark DEAP. The experiments indicate that our method outperforms the related one-stage multi-modal emotion recognition works.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.