ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2023
Classification of the Epileptic Seizure Onset Zone Based on Partial Annotation.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Method Based on Multivariate Variational Mode Decomposition for Classification of Epileptic Signals.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Machine learning detection of epileptic seizure onset zone from iEEG.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Deep learning in intracranial EEG for seizure detection: advances, challenges, and clinical applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Privacy-preserving multi-source semi-supervised domain adaptation for seizure prediction.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Seizure Onset Zone Detection Based on Convolutional Neural Networks and EEG Signals.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Quantitative analysis and machine learning-based interpretation of EEG signals in coma and brain-death diagnosis.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- The high frequency oscillations in the amygdala, hippocampus, and temporal cortex during mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- EEGNet classification of sleep EEG for individual specialization based on data augmentation.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Classification of coma/brain-death EEG dataset based on one-dimensional convolutional neural network.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Advanced framework for epilepsy detection through image-based EEG signal analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy is a chronic disorder caused by excessive electrical discharges. Currently, clinical experts identify the seizure onset zone (SOZ) channel through visual judgment based on long-time intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG), which is a very time-consuming, difficult and experience-based task. Therefore, there is a need for high-accuracy diagnostic aids to reduce the workload of clinical experts. In this article, we propose a method in which, the iEEG is split into the 20-s segment and for each patient, we ask clinical experts to label a part of the data, which is used to train a model and classify the remaining iEEG data. In recent years, machine learning methods have been successfully applied to solve some medical problems. Filtering, entropy and short-time Fourier transform (STFT) are used for extracting features. We compare them to wavelet transform (WT), empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and other traditional methods with the aim of obtaining the best possible discriminating features. Finally, we look for their medical interpretation, which is important for clinical experts. We achieve high-performance results for SOZ and non-SOZ data classification by using the labeled iEEG data and support vector machine (SVM), fully connected neural network (FCNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) as classification models. In addition, we introduce the positive unlabeled (PU) learning to further reduce the workload of clinical experts. By using PU learning, we can learn a binary classifier with a small amount of labeled data and a large amount of unlabeled data. This can greatly reduce the amount and difficulty of annotation work by clinical experts. All together, we show that using 105 minutes of labeled data we achieve a classification result of 91.46% on average for multiple patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.