ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2023
Closed-loop seizure modulation via extreme learning machine based extended state observer.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ephaptic conduction in tonic-clonic seizures.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromodulation is a promising way in clinical treatment of epilepsy, but the existing methods cannot adjust stimulations according to patients' real-time reactions. Therefore, it is necessary to acquire a systematic and a scientific regulation method based on patients' real-time reactions. The linear active disturbance rejection control can adapt to complex epileptic dynamics and improve the epilepsy regulation, even if little model information is available, and various uncertainties and external disturbances exist. However, a linear extended state observer estimates the time-varying total disturbance with a steady-state error. To improve regulation, it is crucial to estimate the total disturbance in a more accurate manner. An extreme learning machine is capable of approximating any nonlinear function. Its initial parameter generation is more convenient, adjustable parameters are fewer, and learning speed is faster. Thus, a nonlinear time-varying function can be estimated more timely and accurately. Then, an extreme learning machine based extended state observer is proposed to get a more satisfactory total disturbance estimation and more desired closed-loop regulation. The convergence of the extreme learning machine based extended state observer is verified and the stability of the closed-loop system is analyzed. Numerical results show that the proposed extended state observer is much better than a linear extended state observer in estimating the total disturbance. It guarantees a more satisfied closed-loop neuromodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.