ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Comparison of the volatile organic compounds in
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Machine learning for food flavor prediction and regulation: models, data integration, and future perspectives.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Intelligent Sensory Systems for Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Review of Electronic Nose, Electronic Tongue, and Machine Vision Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of volatile organic compounds in different parts ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- 4-Vinylguaiacol in Citri Reticulatae 'Chachiensis' Pericarpium Volatile Oil: A Microbial-Mediated Aging Marker Enhances Glucose Metabolism.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Targeted enhancement strategies for Sojae Semen Praeparatum: Impact ofFood chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Chemical and Volatile Compounds in Sweet Potato Brandy: Impact of Processing Methods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quality evaluation of fourFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: In the current study, the main VOCs in CRCP were processed using different drying methods, including sun-drying, hot air drying, and vacuum-freeze drying. The VOCs were identified by the electronic nose (E-nose), gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), and headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Results: The results showed that the CRCP dried by vacuum-freeze exhibited the highest VOCs contents and retained the richest compounds compared to those dried by other methods, which indicated that vacuum-freeze drying is the most suitable for CRCP production. Furthermore, the chemometrics analysis revealed that the primary differential metabolites of the samples generated using different drying methods were terpenes and esters. Discussion: Overall, our study would help better understand the VOCs present in CRCP with different drying methods. The outcomes of the current study would guide the drying and processing of CRCP, which is beneficial for large-scale storage and industrial production of CRCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.