ArticleHeliyon2023
English training requirements and associated factors for non-native English-speaking nurses: A critical gap analysis based on the importance-performance method.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To investigate the English training requirements, priorities, and related factors of non-native English-speaking nurses. Background: Few studies have focused on the English training requirements of nurses in non-native English-speaking hospitals, and even fewer applied quantitative methods to analyze their English needs and related factors. Design: A total of 397 clinical nurses from a hospital in Zhejiang Province, China, were invited to answer questions from the 17-item English Language Requirement Scale (ELRS-17) through an online questionnaire system from May 7-12, 2021. Methods: The importance-performance analysis (IPA) method was used to identify the critical training requirement gaps in the English skills of non-native English-speaking nurses in the case hospital. Results: The results of requirements showed that looking up foreign literature, writing medical/nursing academic articles and reports, and attending international medical/nursing academic conferences were the top three English learning purposes for nurses. Critical gap analysis with the IPA method revealed that medical dialogues (e.g., morning shift conversations), speeches (e.g., academic symposia), and everyday talk (e.g., telephoning and greetings) are very important yet inadequately trained skills for nurses at present, while nurses are adequately competent at the important tasks of understanding medical/nursing lectures and courses and oral international academic reports and reading academic articles and reports. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that English training requirements for non-native English-speaking nurses revolve around facilitating contribution to nursing research and conference attendance, while more focus on spoken English is needed. Hospital decision makers can better understand the requirements and current performance of English language training for non-native English-speaking nurses. Furthermore, a suitable training plan and corresponding content can be designed for nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.