ArticleHeliyon2023
Study on wetting mechanism of nonionic silicone surfactant on coal dust.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using reinforcement algorithms to improve the collaboration efficiency of entrepreneurial teams.PloS one · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms by Which Linear Versus Branched Alkyl Chains in Nonionic Surfactants Govern the Wettability of Long-Flame Coal.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coal dust disasters are serious in coal mining. The use of nonionic surfactants can effectively improve the wettability of coal dust and reduce the content of suspended coal dust in the air. For the problem of low wettability of ordinary surfactants, this paper selects silicone surfactants with high surface activity and low surface tension to improve the wetting ability of coal dust. To explore the wettability of nonionic silicone surfactants on coal dust, the effects of six nonionic silicone surfactants on the wettability of coal dust surfaces were studied by experiments. The test objects were four kinds of coal samples with different metamorphic degrees. The surface tension, wetting time, and contact angle experiments were carried out, and the critical micelle concentration and the expansion coefficient of the coal surface were calculated. The wetting time of the compound solution was measured to verify the synergistic effect of the compound solution. The results show that: 6 # has the best wetting effect on coal dust, followed by 4 # and 2 #; The order of surface tension is: 1 # < 3 # < 4 # < 6 # < 5 # < 2 #, the surface tension of 1 # is the lowest (19.962 mN/m); 1 # and 4 # are easier to spread on the surface of coal dust, the spreading coefficient of coking coal is the largest and the contact angle is the smallest, which is 18.8°. The 4 # and 6 # with a mass ratio of 8:2 were compounded. The compound surfactant solution had a significant synergistic effect. Compared with the monomer surfactant solution, the wettability of long-flame coal and coking coal increased by 15.14% and 10.00%, respectively. The results of this study can provide reference and experimental support for the development of high-efficiency dust suppressants based on silicone surfactants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.