ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2023
Multi-Attribute Monitoring Method for Process Development of Engineered Antibody for Site-Specific Conjugation.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Formulation Matters: The Overlooked Engine of Stability and Success in Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multi-attribute monitoring (MAM) methodology for glycosylated subunit vaccines.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Multi-Laboratory, Multi-Platform Analysis of the Multi-Attribute Method.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and implementation of an LC-MS-based multi-attribute method for adeno-associated virus.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- "Small is beautiful" - Examining reliable determination of low-abundant therapeutic antibody glycovariants.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody drug conjugates, a class of biotherapeutic proteins, have been extensively developed in recent years, resulting in new approvals and improved standard of care for cancer patients. Among the numerous strategies of conjugating cytotoxic payloads to monoclonal antibodies, insertion of a cysteine residue achieves a tightly controlled, site-specific drug to antibody ratio. Tailored analytical tools are required to direct the development of processes capable of manufacturing novel antibody scaffolds with the desired product quality. Here, we describe the development of a 12 min, mass-spectrometry-based method capable of monitoring four distinct quality attributes simultaneously: variations in the thiol state of the inserted cysteines, N-linked glycosylation, reduction of interchain disulfide bonds, and polypeptide fragmentation. This method provides new insight into the properties of the antibody intermediate and associated manufacturing processes. Oxidized thiol states are formed within the bioreactor, of which a variant containing an additional disulfide bond was produced and remained relatively constant throughout the fed-batch process; reduced thiol variants were introduced upon harvest. Nearly 20 percent of N-linked glycans contained sialic acid, substantially higher than anticipated for wildtype IgG1. Lastly, previously unreported polypeptide fragmentation sites were identified in the C239i constant domain, and the relationship between fragmentation and glycoform were explored. This work illustrates the utility of applying a high-throughput liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry multi-attribute monitoring method to support the development of engineered antibody scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.