Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37265185›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Progressively refined deep joint registration segmentation (ProRSeg) of gastrointestinal organs at risk: Application to MRI and cone-beam CT.

Jue Jiang, Jun Hong, Kathryn Tringale, Marsha Reyngold, Christopher Crane, Neelam Tyagi, Harini Veeraraghavan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [An unsupervised three-dimensional medical image registration method based on shifted window Transformer and convolutional neural network].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  5. Real-Time Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jue JiangDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jun HongDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kathryn TringaleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Marsha ReyngoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Christopher CraneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Neelam TyagiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Harini VeeraraghavanDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Artificial Intelligence powered virtual digital twins to construct and validate AI automated tools for safer MR-guided adaptive RT of abdominal cancersR01EB032825 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Neelam Tyagi, Harini Veeraraghavan · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdaptive radiation treatment (ART) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) requires consistently accurate segmentation of the extremely mobile gastrointestinal (GI) organs at risk (OAR) including the stomach, duodenum, large and small bowel. Also, due to lack of sufficiently accurate and fast deformable image registration (DIR), accumulated dose to the GI OARs is currently only approximated, further limiting the ability to more precisely adapt treatments. PURPOSE: Develop a 3-D Progressively refined joint Registration-Segmentation (ProRSeg) deep network to deformably align and segment treatment fraction magnetic resonance images (MRI)s, then evaluate segmentation accuracy, registration consistency, and feasibility for OAR dose accumulation.

methodProRSeg was trained using five-fold cross-validation with 110 T2-weighted MRI acquired at five treatment fractions from 10 different patients, taking care that same patient scans were not placed in training and testing folds. Segmentation accuracy was measured using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance at 95th percentile (HD95). Registration consistency was measured using coefficient of variation (CV) in displacement of OARs. Statistical comparison to other deep learning and iterative registration methods were done using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by pair-wise comparisons with Bonferroni correction applied for multiple testing. Ablation tests and accuracy comparisons against multiple methods were done. Finally, applicability of ProRSeg to segment cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans was evaluated on a publicly available dataset of 80 scans using five-fold cross-validation.

resultsProRSeg processed 3D volumes (128 × 192 × 128) in 3 s on a NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU. It's segmentations were significantly more accurate (

conclusionsProRSeg produced more accurate and consistent GI OARs segmentation and DIR of MRI and CBCTs compared to multiple methods. Preliminary results indicates feasibility for OAR dose accumulation using ProRSeg.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedOrgans at RiskCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedCBCTGI organsMRIrecurrent deep networksregistrationsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37265185
PMCPMC11009869
OpenAlexW4379095428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.