ArticleThe journal of vascular access2024
Cross-cultural validation of the Short-Form Vascular Access Questionnaire.
Article in The journal of vascular access, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient perspective and satisfaction with different types of vascular access in hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis: Findings from a matched cohort study.The journal of vascular access · 2026Article
- Determinants of Patient Satisfaction with Vascular Access in Hemodialysis: Insights from a Multicenter Study in Italy.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVascular access (VA) is a central condition for hemodialysis (HD). Screening patients' views regarding their VA is a significant end point for improving the quality of care. The Short-form Vascular Access Questionnaire (SF-VAQ) is a specific questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction levels regarding their VA. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop the Portuguese version of the SF-VAQ and assess its psychometric properties.
methodsA forward and back translation was used. A multicentric study was conducted with 156 patients undergoing hemodialysis to psychometric testing. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. A construct validity test was conducted using factor analysis. The convergent validity was calculated using the correlation coefficient.
resultsAn obtained Cronbach's alpha of 0.77 indicates good internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was established using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.771. The four sub-scales proposed by the instrument's designer were confirmed, which together accounted for 53% of the variance. The correlation with the Visual Analogue Scale was
conclusionThe Portuguese version of the SF-VAQ is a valid and reliable instrument with good psychometric properties to be implemented to promote an evaluation of VA satisfaction in HD patients and improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.