Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37265062›Full record

SynthesisJournal of comparative effectiveness research2023

Comparative efficacy of therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Imtiaz A Samjoo, Christopher Drudge, Sarah Walsh, Santosh Tiwari, Róisín Brennan, Ibolya Boer, Dieter A Häring, Luisa Klotz, Nicholas Adlard, Judit Banhazi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Natalizumab for multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Peripheral HLA-DRNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Imtiaz A SamjooValue & Evidence, EVERSANA™, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-8055
Christopher DrudgeValue & Evidence, EVERSANA™, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-3069
Sarah WalshValue & Evidence, EVERSANA™, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Santosh TiwariNovartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India.
Róisín BrennanNovartis Corporate Center Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ibolya BoerNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Dieter A HäringNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Luisa KlotzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Westfälische-Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
Nicholas AdlardNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6912-1685
Judit BanhaziNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAlemtuzumabBayes TheoremHumansRecurrenceAlemtuzumabdisease-modifying therapyindirect treatment comparisonnetwork meta-analysisrelapsing multiple sclerosissystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID37265062
PMCPMC10508312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.