Trial reportCirculation2023
Prediction of Shock-Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation During Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Trial report in Circulation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Prediction of shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: external validation of an ECG-based approach.Resuscitation · 2026Article
- Wolf Creek XVIII Part 3: Innovations in Defibrillation Science.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Pad size, orientation, and placement for defibrillation during basic life support: A systematic review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Escalating vs Fixed Energy Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Ventricular Fibrillation.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.Resuscitation · 2025Article
- Top 5 barriers in cardiac arrest research as perceived by international early career researchers - A consensus study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Machine learning prediction of refractory ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using features available to EMS.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Wolf Creek XVII Part 6: Physiology-Guided CPR.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
- Decoding 2.3 million ECGs: interpretable deep learning for advancing cardiovascular diagnosis and mortality risk stratification.European heart journal. Digital health · 2024Article
- Machine learning pre-hospital real-time cardiac arrest outcome prediction (PReCAP) using time-adaptive cohort model based on the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcome Study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) is associated with relatively poor survival. The ability to predict refractory VF (requiring ≥3 shocks) in advance of repeated shock failure could enable preemptive targeted interventions aimed at improving outcome, such as earlier administration of antiarrhythmics, reconsideration of epinephrine use or dosage, changes in shock delivery strategy, or expedited invasive treatments.
methodsWe conducted a cohort study of VF out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to develop an ECG-based algorithm to predict patients with refractory VF. Patients with available defibrillator recordings were randomized 80%/20% into training/test groups. A random forest classifier applied to 3-s ECG segments immediately before and 1 minute after the initial shock during cardiopulmonary resuscitation was used to predict the need for ≥3 shocks based on singular value decompositions of ECG wavelet transforms. Performance was quantified by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsOf 1376 patients with VF out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 311 (23%) were female, 864 (63%) experienced refractory VF, and 591 (43%) achieved functional neurological survival. Total shock count was associated with decreasing likelihood of functional neurological survival, with a relative risk of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97) for each successive shock (
conclusionsA machine learning algorithm using ECGs surrounding the initial shock predicts patients likely to experience refractory VF, and could enable rescuers to preemptively target interventions to potentially improve resuscitation outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.