Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37264812›Full record

ReviewPsychological medicine2023

Psychiatric comorbidity: a concept in need of a theory.

Julie Nordgaard, Kasper Møller Nielsen, Andreas Rosén Rasmussen, Mads Gram Henriksen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pathways to autism diagnosis in adulthood.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Diagnosing ADHD in adults in randomized controlled studies: a scoping review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  11. Kuwait-Mental Illness Disability Scale (K-MIDS):Psychopharmacology bulletin · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie NordgaardMental Health Center Amager, University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2492-9124
Kasper Møller NielsenMental Health Center Amager, University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3222-1751
Andreas Rosén RasmussenMental Health Center Amager, University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1784-4221
Mads Gram HenriksenMental Health Center Amager, University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2103-7318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being a relatively new concept, psychiatric comorbidity, i.e. the co-occurrence of two or more mental disorders, has become widespread in clinical practice and psychiatric research. In this article, we trace the origin of the concept of psychiatric comorbidity, discuss the conceptual literature and point to basic problems concerning inadequate definition of the concept, differential diagnostic issues, and reification of mental disorders. We illustrate how these problems may have consequences for diagnostic assessment in current clinical practice and psychiatric research. To address some of the problems related to psychiatric comorbidity, we discuss potential principles for assessing psychiatric comorbidity. Inspired by Feinstein's original concept of comorbidity in general medicine and his differential diagnostic principles, we emphasize the importance of

Indexed as

Mental DisordersComorbidityHumansdifferential diagnosishierarchyreificationstatetrait

Identifiers

PMID37264812
PMCPMC10520580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.