SynthesisESC heart failure2023
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts prognosis in amyloid cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ventilatory efficiency in cardiac amyloidosis-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Physiological reports · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong and consistent predictor of morbidity and mortality among adults: an overview of meta-analyses representing over 20.9 million observations from 199 unique cohort studies.British journal of sports medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Mexican position paper for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts prognosis in amyloid cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2023Pooled it
- Prognostic impact of chronotropic incompetence in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a multicentre study.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy-new data regarding epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Heart Failure in the Modern Era: A Narrative Overview of Recent Research from 2022-2025.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- VOCurrent cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Correlates with Quantitative Left Ventricular [Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Advancing Cardiac Amyloidosis Care Through Insights from Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- (Non)-Exertional Variables of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Heart Failure with and Without Cardiac Amyloidosis.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is uncertain. Due to the growing prevalence of the disease and the current availability of disease-modifying drugs, prognostic stratification is becoming fundamental to optimizing the cost-effectiveness of treatment, patient phenotyping, follow-up, and management. Peak VO METHODS AND
resultsWe performed a systematic review and searched for clinical studies performing CPET for prognostication in patients with transthyretin-CA and light-chain-CA. Studies reporting hazard ratio (HR) for mortality and peak VO
conclusionsCPET is a valuable tool for prognostic stratification in CA, identifying patients at increased risk of death. Large prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm this exploratory finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.