Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37264425›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2023

Prevalence of udder pathogens in milk samples from Norwegian dairy cows recorded in a national database in 2019 and 2020.

Marit Smistad, Haakon Christopher Bakka, Liv Sølverød, Hannah Joan Jørgensen, Cecilia Wolff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marit SmistadTINE Mastitis Laboratory, P.O. Box 2038, 6402, Molde, Norway. marit.smistad@tine.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9282-3594
Haakon Christopher BakkaNorwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 64, 1431, Ås, Norway.
Liv SølverødTINE Mastitis Laboratory, P.O. Box 2038, 6402, Molde, Norway.
Hannah Joan JørgensenNorwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 64, 1431, Ås, Norway.
Cecilia WolffNorwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 64, 1431, Ås, Norway.
Norwegian Veterinary Institute · NOMolde Hospital · NOTine (Norway) · NO

Funding

Foundation for Research Levy on Agricultural Products 280364Norges Forskningsråd 288917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of aetiological agents of mastitis in dairy cattle is important for herd management of udder health. In Norway, results from mastitis diagnostics are systematically recorded in a central database, so that the dairy industry can follow trends in the recorded frequency of udder pathogens and antimicrobial resistance patterns at national level. However, bacteriological testing of milk samples is based on voluntary sampling, and data are therefore subject to some bias. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of udder pathogens in Norwegian dairy cows by analysing data from the national routine mastitis diagnostics and to explore how routines for sampling and diagnostic interpretations may affect the apparent prevalence of different bacterial pathogens. We also assessed associations between udder pathogen findings and the barn- and milking systems of the herds.

resultsThe most frequently detected major udder pathogens among all milk samples submitted for bacterial culture (n = 36,431) were Staphylococcus aureus (24.5%), Streptococcus dysgalactiae (13.3%) and Streptococcus uberis (9.0%). In the subset of samples from clinical mastitis (n = 7598); Escherichia coli (14.5%) was the second most frequently detected pathogen following S. aureus (27.1%). Staphylococcus epidermidis (10.0%), Corynebacterium bovis (9.4%), and Staphylococcus chromogenes (6.0%) dominated among the minor udder pathogens. Non-aureus staphylococci as a group, identified in 39% of the sampling events, was the most frequently identified udder pathogen in Norway. By using different definitions of cow-level bacterial diagnoses, the distribution of minor udder pathogens changed. Several udder pathogens were associated with the barn- and milking system but the associations were reduced in strength when data were analysed from farms with a comparable herd size. S. aureus was associated with tiestall housing, E. coli and S. dysgalactiae were associated with freestall housing, and S. epidermidis was associated with automatic milking systems. Only 2.5% of the 10,675 tested S. aureus isolates were resistant to benzylpenicillin. Among the 2153 tested non-aureus staphylococci, altogether 34% were resistant to benzylpenicillin.

conclusionsThis study presents the recorded prevalence of udder pathogens in Norway over a two-year period and assesses the possible impact of the sampling strategies, diagnostic methods and diagnostic criteria utilized in Norway, as well as associations with different housing and milking systems. The national database with records of results from routine mastitis diagnostics in Norway provides valuable information about the aetiology of bovine mastitis at population level and can reveal shifts in the distribution and occurrence of udder pathogens.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMastitis, BovineStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsCattleDairyingEscherichia coliFemaleMammary Glands, AnimalMilkPrevalenceStaphylococcus aureusAntimicrobial resistanceBovine udder healthIntramammary infectionMastitisMilking systemStaphylococciStreptococciUdder pathogens

Identifiers

PMID37264425
PMCPMC10234032
OpenAlexW4378981766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.