Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37264413›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2023

Epiphytic common core bacteria in the microbiomes of co-located green (Ulva), brown (Saccharina) and red (Grateloupia, Gelidium) macroalgae.

De-Chen Lu, Feng-Qing Wang, Rudolf I Amann, Hanno Teeling, Zong-Jun Du

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Enrichment isolation and metabolic characteristics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Oxygen-tolerant nitrogen fixation in a marine alga-colonizingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

De-Chen LuMarine College, Shandong University, No. 180, Wenhua Xilu, Weihai, Shandong Province, 264209, China.
Feng-Qing WangMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, Bremen, 28359, Germany.
Rudolf I AmannMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, Bremen, 28359, Germany.
Hanno TeelingMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstraße 1, Bremen, 28359, Germany. hteeling@mpi-bremen.de.
Zong-Jun DuMarine College, Shandong University, No. 180, Wenhua Xilu, Weihai, Shandong Province, 264209, China. duzongjun@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacroalgal epiphytic microbial communities constitute a rich resource for novel enzymes and compounds, but studies so far largely focused on tag-based microbial diversity analyses or limited metagenome sequencing of single macroalgal species.

resultsWe sampled epiphytic bacteria from specimens of Ulva sp. (green algae), Saccharina sp. (brown algae), Grateloupia sp. and Gelidium sp. (both red algae) together with seawater and sediment controls from a coastal reef in Weihai, China, during all seasons. Using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, we identified 14 core genera (consistently present on all macroalgae), and 14 dominant genera (consistently present on three of the macroalgae). Core genera represented ~ 0.7% of all genera, yet accounted for on average 51.1% of the bacterial abundances. Plate cultivation from all samples yielded 5,527 strains (macroalgae: 4,426) representing 1,235 species (685 potentially novel). Sequencing of selected strains yielded 820 non-redundant draft genomes (506 potentially novel), and sequencing of 23 sampled metagenomes yielded 1,619 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), representing further 1,183 non-redundant genomes. 230 isolates and 153 genomes were obtained from the 28 core/dominant genera. We analyzed the genomic potential of phycosphere bacteria to degrade algal polysaccharides and to produce bioactive secondary metabolites. We predicted 4,451 polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) and 8,810 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). These were particularly prevalent in core/dominant genera.

conclusionsOur metabolic annotations and analyses of MAGs and genomes provide new insights into novel species of phycosphere bacteria and their ecological niches for an improved understanding of the macroalgal phycosphere microbiome. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

LaminariaMicrobiotaRhodophytaSeaweedUlvaBacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAlgaeBacteriaBiofilmBiosynthetic gene clusterGelidiumGrateloupiaMacroalgaeMarineMicrobiomePhycospherePolysaccharide utilization locusSaccharinaUlva

Identifiers

PMID37264413
PMCPMC10233909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.