Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37264300›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

A survey and stakeholder consultation of Independent Domestic Violence Advisor (IDVA) programmes in English maternity services.

Camilla Forbes, Hayley Alderson, Jill Domoney, Alexandra Papamichail, Vashti Berry, Ruth McGovern, Nick Sevdalis, Judith Rankin, Mary Newburn, Andy Healey and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla ForbesUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK. c.a.mchugh@exeter.ac.uk.
Hayley AldersonNewcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. Hayley.Alderson@newcastle.ac.uk.
Jill DomoneyKing's College London, London, UK.
Alexandra PapamichailKing's College London, London, UK.
Vashti BerryUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Ruth McGovernNewcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Nick SevdalisKing's College London, London, UK.
Judith RankinNewcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Mary NewburnKing's College London, London, UK.
Andy HealeyKing's College London, London, UK.
Abigail EasterKing's College London, London, UK.
Margaret HeslinKing's College London, London, UK.
Gene FederBristol University, Bristol, UK.
Kristian HudsonImprovement Academy, Bradford, UK.
Claire A WilsonKing's College London, London, UK.
G J Melendez-TorresUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Louise M HowardKing's College London, London, UK.
Kylee TrevillionKing's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBImprovement Service · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare-based Independent Domestic Violence Advisors (hIDVA) are evidence-based programmes that provide emotional and practical support to service users experiencing domestic abuse. hIDVA programmes are found to improve health outcomes for service users and are increasingly delivered across a range of healthcare settings. However, it is unclear how hIDVA programmes are implemented across maternity services and the key facilitators and barriers to their implementation. The aim of this study was to identify; how many English National Health Service (NHS) Trusts with maternity services have a hIDVA programme; which departments within the Trust they operate in; what format, content, and variation in hIDVA programmes exist; and key facilitators and barriers of implementation in maternity services.

methodsA national survey of safeguarding midwives (Midwives whose role specifically tasks them to protect pregnant women from harm including physical, emotional, sexual and financial harm and neglect) within all maternity services across England; descriptive statistics were used to summarise responses. A World Café event (a participatory method, which aims to create a café atmosphere to facilitate informal conversation) with 38 national key stakeholders to examine barriers and facilitators to hIDVA programme implementation.

results86/124 Trusts (69%) with a maternity service responded to the survey; 59(69%) of respondents reported that they had a hIDVA programme, and 47(55%) of the hIDVA programmes operated within maternity services. Key facilitators to implementation of hIDVA programmes included training of NHS staff about the hIDVA role and regular communication between Trust staff and hIDVA staff; hIDVA staff working directly from the Trust; co-creation of hIDVA programmes with experts by experience; governance and middle- and senior-management support. Key barriers included hIDVA staff having a lack of access to a private space for their work, insecure funding for hIDVA programmes and issues with recruitment and retention of hIDVA staff.

conclusionsDespite hIDVA programmes role in improving the health outcomes of service users experiencing domestic abuse, increased funding and staff training is needed to successfully implement hIDVA staff in maternity services. Integrated Care Board commissioning of acute and mental health trust services would benefit from ensuring hIDVA programmes and clinician DVA training are prioritised.

Indexed as

Domestic ViolenceState MedicineFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesDomestic violenceHealthhIDVAImplementationMaternity services

Identifiers

PMID37264300
PMCPMC10233538
OpenAlexW4379054609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.