ArticleNature ecology & evolution2023
Single-cell dissection of aggression in honeybee colonies.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- MilliMap: interactive closed-loop analysis for spatial omics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- RESCUE: recovery of unattributed expression patterns in spatial transcriptomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- CellPolaris: Transfer Learning for Gene Regulatory Network Construction to Guide Cell State Transitions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Hangry bees: Pollen dearth impacts honey bee (Apis mellifera) behavior and physiology.PloS one · 2026Article
- Genetic variation influences food-sharing sociability in honey bees.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Integrating Deep Learning and Transcriptomics to Assess Livestock Aggression: A Scoping Review.Biology · 2025Review
- Single-nucleus and spatial transcriptomics identify brain landscape of gene regulatory networks associated with behavioral maturation in honeybees.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Omics in mini-livestock: a genomic perspective on the future of sustainable food systems.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Consistency and individuality of honeybee stinging behaviour across time and social contexts.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- The brain atlas of a subsocial bee reflects that of eusocial Hymenoptera.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2024Article
- NMDAR-CaMKII Pathway as a Central Regulator of Aggressiveness: Evidence from Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis in Swimming CrabsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The genomic case against genetic determinism.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- SPREd: a simulation-supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Review
- SPREd: A simulation-supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how genotypic variation results in phenotypic variation is especially difficult for collective behaviour because group phenotypes arise from complex interactions among group members. A genome-wide association study identified hundreds of genes associated with colony-level variation in honeybee aggression, many of which also showed strong signals of positive selection, but the influence of these 'colony aggression genes' on brain function was unknown. Here we use single-cell (sc) transcriptomics and gene regulatory network (GRN) analyses to test the hypothesis that genetic variation for colony aggression influences individual differences in brain gene expression and/or gene regulation. We compared soldiers, which respond to territorial intrusion with stinging attacks, and foragers, which do not. Colony environment showed stronger influences on soldier-forager differences in brain gene regulation compared with brain gene expression. GRN plasticity was strongly associated with colony aggression, with larger differences in GRN dynamics detected between soldiers and foragers from more aggressive relative to less aggressive colonies. The regulatory dynamics of subnetworks composed of genes associated with colony aggression genes were more strongly correlated with each other across different cell types and brain regions relative to other genes, especially in brain regions involved with olfaction and vision and multimodal sensory integration, which are known to mediate bee aggression. These results show how group genetics can shape a collective phenotype by modulating individual brain gene regulatory network architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.