Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37264198›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2023

Evidence-based target setting informs blue carbon strategies for nationally determined contributions.

Katie K Arkema, Jade M S Delevaux, Jessica M Silver, Samantha G Winder, Lisa M Schile-Beers, Nadia Bood, Stephen Crooks, Karen Douthwaite, Courtney Durham, Peter L Hawthorne and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Katie K ArkemaNatural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. karkema@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2465-6357
Jade M S DelevauxNatural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-9823
Jessica M SilverNatural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Samantha G WinderNatural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-6916
Lisa M Schile-BeersSilvestrum Climate Associates, Sausalito, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8565-3825
Nadia BoodWorld Wildlife Fund Mesoamerica, Belize Field Office, Belize City, Belize.
Stephen CrooksSilvestrum Climate Associates, Sausalito, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0881-2524
Karen DouthwaiteOcean Conservation, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA.
Courtney DurhamThe Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC, USA.
Peter L HawthorneInstitute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1125-5239
Thomas HickeyThe Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC, USA.
Colin MattisNational Climate Change Office, Belmopan, Belize.
Andria RosadoCoastal Zone Management Authority and Institute, Belize City, Belize.
Mary RuckelshausNatural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9492-2708
Moritz von UngerSilvestrum Climate Associates, Sausalito, CA, USA.
Arlene YoungCoastal Zone Management Authority and Institute, Belize City, Belize.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnitude and pace of global climate change demand ambitious and effective implementation of nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Nature-based solutions present an efficient approach to achieving mitigation, adaptation and resilience goals. Yet few nations have quantified the diverse benefits of nature-based solutions to evaluate and select ecosystem targets for their NDCs. Here we report on Belize's pursuit of innovative, evidence-based target setting by accounting for multiple benefits of blue carbon strategies. Through quantification of carbon storage and sequestration and optimization of co-benefits, we explore time-bound targets and prioritize locations for mangrove protection and restoration. We find increases in carbon benefits with larger mangrove investments, while fisheries, tourism and coastal risk-reduction co-benefits grow initially and then plateau. We identify locations, currently lacking protected status, where prioritizing blue carbon strategies would provide the greatest delivery of co-benefits to communities. These findings informed Belize's updated NDCs to include an additional 12,000 ha of mangrove protection and 4,000 ha of mangrove restoration, respectively, by 2030. Our study serves as an example for the more than 150 other countries that have the opportunity to enhance greenhouse gas sequestration and climate adaptation by incorporating blue carbon strategies that provide multiple societal benefits into their NDCs.

Indexed as

EcosystemWetlandsCarbonCarbon SequestrationClimate ChangeCarbon

Identifiers

PMID37264198
PMCPMC10333125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.