Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37264039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Detecting introgressive hybridization to maintain genetic integrity in endangered large waterbird: a case study in milky stork.

Damisa Kaminsin, Natapot Warrit, Rangsinee Sankhom, Krittee Piamsanga, Saowaphang Sanannu, Sudarath Baicharoen, Amporn Wiwegweaw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Damisa KaminsinPopulation and Conservation Genetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Natapot WarritCenter of Excellence in Entomology and Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Rangsinee SankhomDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, UK.
Krittee PiamsangaPopulation and Conservation Genetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Saowaphang SanannuGenomic Resource Center, Animal Conservation and Research Institute, The Zoological Park Organization of Thailand, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand.
Sudarath BaicharoenGenetic Center, Animal Conservation and Research Institute, The Zoological Park Organization of Thailand, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand.
Amporn WiwegweawPopulation and Conservation Genetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. amporn.w@chula.ac.th.
Chulalongkorn University · THZoological Park Organization · THUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization between milky stork (Mycteria cinerea) and painted stork (M. leucocephala) occurs frequently in captivity. Dusit Zoo is a captive breeding facility where storks with phenotypically ambiguous patterns have recently been observed, and their status remaining inconclusive. Here, we used a combination of phenotypic characters and genetic markers (cytochrome b and 14 microsatellite markers) to distinguish and identify hybrids from the two parental species (n = 114). Haplotype analysis revealed asymmetric mtDNA introgression from M. cinerea to M. leucocephala, with twelve morphologically classified M. leucocephala individuals carrying heterospecific mtDNA. Comprehensive biparental genetic assessments identified 33% of all three genetic clusters as admixed individuals, of which most were either F2 hybrids, backcrosses with M. leucocephala, or hybrids of unknown generation, implying weak premating isolation with the absence of intrinsic postzygotic isolation between parentals. Morphological analysis demonstrated that the absence or indistinctness of a black bar across the breast is the most noticeable trait to identify these hybrids. The endangered M. cinerea was found to have genomic contamination from M. leucocephala and vice versa, with at least 41 hybrid individuals being identified. These findings provide critical information for detecting hybrids and identifying suitable breeding stocks with genetic purity for future reintroduction and conservation management.

Indexed as

Genetic IntrogressionHybridization, GeneticDNA, MitochondrialHaplotypesHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsPhenotypeDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID37264039
PMCPMC10235083
OpenAlexW4379055264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.