Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37263997›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

The effectiveness of global protected areas for climate change mitigation.

L Duncanson, M Liang, V Leitold, J Armston, S M Krishna Moorthy, R Dubayah, S Costedoat, B J Enquist, L Fatoyinbo, S J Goetz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Collaborative management partnerships strongly decreased deforestation in the most at-risk protected areas in Africa since 2000.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

L DuncansonDepartment of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. lduncans@umd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4031-3493
M LiangDepartment of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
V LeitoldDepartment of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
J ArmstonDepartment of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
S M Krishna MoorthyDepartment of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
R DubayahDepartment of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1440-6346
S CostedoatMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9496-4542
B J EnquistDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
L FatoyinboNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-6748
S J GoetzSchool of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-4308
M Gonzalez-RoglichWCS, General Roca, Río Negro, Argentina.
C MerowEversource Energy Center and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0561-053X
P R RoehrdanzMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-5011
K TaborNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-3056
A ZvoleffMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · USConservation International · USGoddard Space Flight Center · USNational University of Río Negro · ARNorthern Arizona University · USSanta Fe Institute · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC21K0189National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC21K0196National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NNL 15AA03CNational Science Foundation (NSF) 80NSSC19K0186National Science Foundation (NSF) OAC1934389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forests play a critical role in stabilizing Earth's climate. Establishing protected areas (PAs) represents one approach to forest conservation, but PAs were rarely created to mitigate climate change. The global impact of PAs on the carbon cycle has not previously been quantified due to a lack of accurate global-scale carbon stock maps. Here we used ~412 million lidar samples from NASA's GEDI mission to estimate a total PA aboveground carbon (C) stock of 61.43 Gt (+/- 0.31), 26% of all mapped terrestrial woody C. Of this total, 9.65 + /- 0.88 Gt of additional carbon was attributed to PA status. These higher C stocks are primarily from avoided emissions from deforestation and degradation in PAs compared to unprotected forests. This total is roughly equivalent to one year of annual global fossil fuel emissions. These results underscore the importance of conservation of high biomass forests for avoiding carbon emissions and preserving future sequestration.

Identifiers

PMID37263997
PMCPMC10235066
OpenAlexW4379055284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.