ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2024
Automatic AI-based contouring of prostate MRI for online adaptive radiotherapy.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metal artifact reduction for 3 T MRI-only prostate radiotherapy in patients with hip prostheses: impact on target definition, synthetic CT generation, dose calculation, and fiducial marker identification.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Real-world clinical impact of implementing and updating a deep learning-based automatic contouring system in rectal cancer radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Uncertainty estimation for reliable neural network-based radiotherapy dose modelling using Monte Carlo dropout, mean variance estimation and deep ensemble.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-enhanced image registration for accelerating daily adaptive magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- A new perspective on radiotherapy in the comprehensive treatment of cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Improving workflow efficiency during prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy using real-time adaptive planning associated with reduced intra-fractional target motion.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Conditional organs-of-interest segmentation with plausible inter-fraction variation simulation for pancreatic magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in limited-data settings.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in adaptive radiotherapy-a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Feasibility of reusing online-generated treatment plans for adaptive radiotherapy in prostate cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of CNN-based deep learning models for auto-contouring in glioblastoma radiotherapy: a review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Review
- Real-world performance evaluation of commercial autocontouring software for head and neck cancer radiotherapy.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Optimizing Treatment Precision: Role of Adaptive Radiotherapy in Modern Anal Cancer Management.Cancers · 2025Review
- Transforming Prostate Cancer Care: Innovations in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Quantifying the dosimetric impact of online daily adaptation for MR-guided RT in cervical cancer.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Observational
- Personalized deep learning auto-segmentation models for adaptive fractionated magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy of the abdomen.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for treatment delivery: image-guided radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Review
- MR-linac: role of artificial intelligence and automation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Review
- Editorial: Artificial intelligence and imaging for oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) online plan adaptation accounts for tumor volume changes, interfraction motion and thus allows daily sparing of relevant organs at risk. Due to the high interfraction variability of bladder and rectum, patients with tumors in the pelvic region may strongly benefit from adaptive MRgRT. Currently, fast automatic annotation of anatomical structures is not available within the online MRgRT workflow. Therefore, the aim of this study was to train and validate a fast, accurate deep learning model for automatic MRI segmentation at the MR-Linac for future implementation in a clinical MRgRT workflow. MATERIALS AND
methodsFor a total of 47 patients, T2w MRI data were acquired on a 1.5 T MR-Linac (Unity, Elekta) on five different days. Prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum, anal canal, bladder, penile bulb, body and bony structures were manually annotated. These training data consisting of 232 data sets in total was used for the generation of a deep learning based autocontouring model and validated on 20 unseen T2w-MRIs. For quantitative evaluation the validation set was contoured by a radiation oncologist as gold standard contours (GSC) and compared in MATLAB to the automatic contours (AIC). For the evaluation, dice similarity coefficients (DSC), and 95% Hausdorff distances (95% HD), added path length (APL) and surface DSC (sDSC) were calculated in a caudal-cranial window of ± 4 cm with respect to the prostate ends. For qualitative evaluation, five radiation oncologists scored the AIC on the possible usage within an online adaptive workflow as follows: (1) no modifications needed, (2) minor adjustments needed, (3) major adjustments/ multiple minor adjustments needed, (4) not usable.
resultsThe quantitative evaluation revealed a maximum median 95% HD of 6.9 mm for the rectum and minimum median 95% HD of 2.7 mm for the bladder. Maximal and minimal median DSC were detected for bladder with 0.97 and for penile bulb with 0.73, respectively. Using a tolerance level of 3 mm, the highest and lowest sDSC were determined for rectum (0.94) and anal canal (0.68), respectively. Qualitative evaluation resulted in a mean score of 1.2 for AICs over all organs and patients across all expert ratings. For the different autocontoured structures, the highest mean score of 1.0 was observed for anal canal, sacrum, femur left and right, and pelvis left, whereas for prostate the lowest mean score of 2.0 was detected. In total, 80% of the contours were rated be clinically acceptable, 16% to require minor and 4% major adjustments for online adaptive MRgRT.
conclusionIn this study, an AI-based autocontouring was successfully trained for online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy on the 1.5 T MR-Linac system. The developed model can automatically generate contours accepted by physicians (80%) or only with the need of minor corrections (16%) for the irradiation of primary prostate on the clinically employed sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.